Progressive Odyssey

Minority

2012-02-03T05:51:00.003-06:00

I found out today that I was turned down from a program at North Carolina State designed to help aspiring faculty get a better handle on their career path. The program is mostly geared towards "under represented" (I think this is the new term for "minority") graduate students and being a white male, as always, my application was kindly rejected.

The irony is that a quick survey of the faculty in the electrical engineering departments of most universities would show that most faculty are not white males; south-central and east Asians rule these programs. In every graduate course I've taken I have been the minority. I would say that in most cases I am out-numbered 50 to 1. Its not unusual for their to be more Asian women in these classes than white men.

And don't even get me started about all the scholarships for women when women out-number men on virtually all US campuses and have for several decades. These programs seeking to correct injustices and imbalances in higher education appear to have accomplished their goal yet continue to exist, pushing the balance past the point of equity. I hear of opportunities all the time for women in engineering; where are the special promotional opportunities for men in fields traditionally dominated by women? Do you know of any scholarships for men seeking to be nurses or elementary school teachers? I don't.

There may be a day when our culture decides to value men but I don't think that day is coming soon.

University Education

2012-01-25T11:28:00.001-06:00

A good friend of mine gave me an interesting model for defining the roles of universities: discovering new knowledge (research), disseminating knowledge (education) and preserving knowledge (libraries). Though there are many other aspects to universities (dorm life, campus clubs, and don't even get me started on the tail-wagging-the-dog of athletics), these three seem at the core of why universities exist and their traditional value in society.

If asked to rank these three in order of centrality, I bet most people would place education at the top of the list. When we think of colleges and universities, we think of going to classes, cramming for tests, and reading books (among other things). We have the phrase "a college education" for a reason and for most people, we aspire to such an education. Being college educated means something in our culture and the effort it takes to get that diploma is generally respected.

Without an education role, universities would look very different and be unrecognizable. There would be no lecture halls and classrooms, no student union, no students milling around campus. There would be labs and libraries filled with older men and women working on the next great idea. In some sense these would be like monasteries where the chosen or the elite go to their private work. It may be possible to visit and observe but it would be difficult to ever be a part of the life of the university. They would be places where important people did important things and most of us would never really participate.

Thankfully, this is not how most of our universities exist today.

Sort of.

Though our universities continue to espouse a role in education, classes continue to be held, tests administered, grades given, it doesn't take too much time of being a university student to discover that something is distinctly wrong. Classes can be large, instruction may be provided by graduate students instead of faculty, instructors don't always know their students by name, textbooks are expensive and unreadable; students can feel like small cogs in the university machine. Getting an education, actually learning something, takes place in spite of the system, not because of it. Pay these fees, pass these classes, get this diploma, feel college educated. And the larger and most prestigious the university, the more alienating this feeling can be. How did the education part of university become so lacking?

At least part of the answer (perhaps all of it) becomes clear when the other half of the eduction process is examined: that of the knowledgeable professor who it would seem has been charged with filling eager young minds with profound thoughts. Particularly at larger, research-oriented universities, job security for faculty members comes from the number of scholarly articles they write, the number of conference presentations they give, and the general esteem they develop for themselves and the university as a result of their research. When the time comes for the university to decide if they will retain a professor indefinitely (tenure), the primary factor in that decision is often their research activity. A professor can have documented proof in the form of student surveys and complaints demonstrating a distinct lack of teaching skill or disregard for the education process and still be granted tenure at many universities. The converse, an excellent educator who has mediocre or poor research accomplishments has virtually no chance of being retained.

So you can see the problem. Even if a new faculty member desires to be a good educator and wants to invest the time and energy into providing an excellent classroom experience for his or her students, there is little incentive to do so. The new professor can read the writing on the wall and if he or she wants to still have this job ten years down the road, the path is clear: produce original research, get published, get noticed. In this context, classroom responsibilities are a hindrance and barrier holding back the new faculty member.

In light of the incentives universities have placed before their faculties, it is easy to see how a university-level education isn't always what it is cracked up to be. New faculty can't be bothered to care about classrooms, their jobs are on the line if they don't produce research. Even tenured faculty who do have a large degree of job security have no specific incentive to become excellent educators. If they desire to do so they have that freedom but it will mean walking away from the traditional measure of a successful faculty, namely research. Using graduate students as instructors in lower-level classes allows universities to free up faculty to do research, provide instruction at a much lower cost, and provide graduate students an opportunity to learn how to teach in a very trial-by-fire manner.

The scenario described above is obviously a generality but it is true. There are universities that have avoided this problem and generally they do it by choosing to be not research-oriented. Many of these colleges and universities have no graduate program and have very little if any research being conducted. Often they are also smaller, less prestigious, and private (rather than state-funded). But because the faculty make their bread-and-butter teaching, the instruction can often be excellent and the students get the benefits of a true college education.

To the extent that big state schools have diminished or forsaken their role in truly educating their students, they have become corrupt, placing the prestige of the institution over the good of the students. The students in these places are forced to make a choice: do they stay in the system that has walked away from education to get a name-brand diploma or do they find a smaller school that can provide a high-quality education. (Often, there is little choice due to other factors like cost and lack of feasible alternatives.) So the universities keeps producing graduates who may or may not have learned what they should have learned and the diploma of a school is less and less a marker of quality and more a symbol of which club the graduate belonged to.

The situation is more complex than I paint it here and as you might suspect, money is wrapped up in many aspects of it. My point is simple, though. Despite these complexities if a university is not providing a worthwhile education, if the faculty has little or no incentive to provide excellent instruction, if the seal of approval that is called a diploma does not certify something meaningful and valuable about the product of a given university's education process, then the university is failing in one of its fundamental roles. Furthermore, the value of the university to society will diminish over time and what a college education once meant, it will mean no longer. If graduation from a given university is not related to the demonstration of the acquisition of something (skills, knowledge, expertise of some kind), then the university has become a diploma mill and we are all the worse off for it.

Political Parties

2012-01-15T19:11:00.005-06:00

Says Newt Gingrich:

"You need a solid conservative because you have to be able to draw the contrast. If we [Republicans] run a moderate who is in any way close to where Obama is, we'll lose."

I understand political parties have a primary goal to win elections. These parties are formed so that somewhat disperate beliefs can be unified behind single candidates that are generally close enough to the parties common goals. Its always an imperfect fit and everybody is always unhappy in some ways with the candidates and leaders they put forward but everybody in the party agrees that having their candidate win is better than letting somebody else into office. Political parties are fundamentally about winning.

Newt Gingrich is a very experienced politician and he understands this in very practical ways much better than I probably ever will. His words above make sense, too, because he is the "solid conservative" compared to the front-runner and more moderate Mitt Romney. He is making the case that a moderate candidate will appear too similar to President Obama and all those in the center of the political landscape will view little distinction between the candidates. If there's no difference between the two, why vote for one over the other. Even if a voter doesn't care for Obama, he or she may reason it is better to stick with the "devil you know" rather than vote for a similar but unknown candidate.

Here's the fundamental flaw in Gingrich's argument: you can't win an election if most of the voters don't want a
"solid conservative". It could be that most voters are more interested in more moderate candidates and that running a candidate too far from political center will ensure that only a minority of voters will be interested in said candidate and the election will be lost. If this is the case, the Republicans are in a difficult spot: they need to run a candidate who is centrist enough in beliefs to attract enough votes to win but distinct enough to motivate voters away from the politically similar incumbent.

And, of course, there's the more general problem with political parties and their focus on winning: if the goal is winning and beating the other teams, its easy to lose track of what should be the more fundamental goal of making the country a better place. I suppose political parties do believe that their way is the best way in which case what is best for the party (winning elections and being in political power) is best for the country. For this equality to hold, the other side must be void of good ideas, completely bereft of worthwhile plans, and lacking in any moral authority; it takes arrogance to make this claim. If "best" equals "our team" then by definition the other team must have nothing to offer, there can be no good ideas they can contribute; if the other side did have something to offer, the combination of ideas would be better than "best".

To ensure victory often means discrediting the other team, even the ideas that may be good and helpful. My friend calls this "football politics", placing victory in the political contest above the good of the country. It seems that the major political parties today have decided that winning is the most important thing and seem to do all they can to vilify, discredit, and destroy their opponents. Each side seems to have decided the only way to victory is through the complete refutation of the other side including the ideas that might be helpful.

This is why I'm an independent.

PDX Wonder

2012-01-10T15:43:00.000-06:00

Of all the airports I have visited, I enjoy the Portland, Oregon (PDX) airport the most. I like the skylights, the central listing of flights right after security, the floor map of the rivers, the MAX terminal, the glass canopy, the sky-walks and the free wireless internet. (I don't care for the carpet which has not changed style for as long as I can remember. It may not have been changed period, even when the airport was redesigned.)

This, though, this is my absolute favorite part of the entire airport. It serves no purpose but to whimsically amaze and it works on me every time.

I'll leave it to you to figure out the magic.

(The fixtures are on both sides of the ramp down from security at the start of Concourse C. With the "new" connector in place once you get through security on either side you can walk over and examine the miracle for yourself. I highly encourage this.)

The Amazon Return

2011-12-22T09:36:00.001-06:00

I just spent half an hour dealing with Amazon on trying to start the return process for a defective gift I received. I've had great experiences with the retailer in the past but this time it was awful. All of the problems I had stemmed from not having the order number for the item. This seems like an unnecessary burden to place on me, the gift receiver. I know what the item is, I know who gave it to me and I know it was ordered from Amazon. It seems like this should be enough to uniquely identify the transaction and process the return.

It isn't, though. I can't process the return online without an order number and despite the statement on the return webpage that I can contact customer service to get the order number, I still don't have it. I did an online chat with a customer service representative (hi, Alvin!) who said that without a tracking number or an order number he could not start the return process. My second attempt (once it became clear to me that Alvin was not a top-notch support specialist) was a phone call that was quickly answered but where the representative stated a similar story. This time I countered that the return webpage stated I could get the order number from him if I provided certain details on the sender (name, email address, ...). I provided the particulars, he put me on hold and then hung up.

Clearly there has been a holiday hiring binge and I don't expect these representative to be the best Amazon has to offer. I do expect them to be competent, though, and I do expect there to be agreement between what their website says and what the representatives say.

For now, I'm trying to get an order number and see if I can actually get the return processed. I think the downsides of the gigantic online retailer are becoming more clear.

Conference at Berkeley

2011-12-16T08:02:00.000-06:00

A week ago I was fortunate enough to head out to another power conference, this time it was off to Berkeley where the 60'F temperatures were much more welcome than the 16'F temperatures I left behind.

First up, look what I found in my purse after arriving in California:

This is a saw blade (about the size of a pocketknife) that I accidentally smuggled onto the plane and I didn't find it until my second day in California. I have no idea why the x-ray machine did not catch it; maybe it looked like a comb? This is one more anecdotal indication that taking off our shows and belts doesn't seem to be keeping weapons from making it onto planes.

We stayed at a hotel within walking distance of campus that is by far the fanciest hotel I have been a guest at: the Claremont. As was proudly displayed behind the check-in desk, this was a four diamond hotel. In the lobby was a large, two-story Christmas display. The hotel looked like a palace from the outside and it was clear after spending some time inside that this was an old building constructed in a time long before Berkeley was the place it is today.

What's more, for reasons I don't quite understand, the room I was staying in was upgraded and I was put in a suite for the two nights I was there. One bedroom, one bathroom, and one common living room and dining room. The desk clerk said the room was $1500/night and in the high-priced housing market of the Bay area, I would believe that. Its a shame we were in meetings all day and didn't get a chance to enjoy the room.

We did have a little bit of free time to spend walking the neighborhood and it was interesting to see how living was managed in such a space-constrained area. This was definitely an urban neighborhood; I saw very few apartment buildings but only the most wealthy seemed to be able to afford a front yard. Some neighborhoods were row-houses packed right next to each other and some were only slightly more spread out. Lots of people of bikes, not much parking and a fair amount of pedestrian traffic.

I also saw a church in our walk with a very interesting architectural style. Mostly concrete with a very cubic design (that doesn't show up well in the photograph). It looked more like a bunker than a place of spiritual communion; I have no idea if the building was designed as a church or not.

One of the residents used their small plot of garden/front yard for an orange tree: I think this is the first time I had ever seen one.

And what would a trip to Berkeley be like without out some politically liberal culture. I have here for your examination disposable silverware made from potatoes and a protest recruitment poster.

The conference itself was great as usual. I always enjoy the opportunity to hear what others are working on and the ideas that are being kicked around. Within hours of the completion of the even, one of the presenters made a great point about how the power grid is changing right now. Up until recently, it has been the responsibility of the utilities/generator owners to ensure that they could provide enough power for all customers on demand; the generation followed the load. With the growth of renewables whose output is beyond our control we are starting to see small reversals in this trend where some load is starting to follow the availability of the generation.

For the longest time the electrical industry was a one-way street where there was no negotiation and the electrical customer was always right. If the customer wanted electricity, the customer got it. Now the relationship is starting to gain elements of negotiation and the utilities are trying to find ways where they are providing incentives to allow them to control customer's loads (like charging an electric car or running the clothes drier) based on when cheap electricity is available.

Something to think about and keep in mind when you hear stories about the smart grid or changes in the power industry.

Bicycling

2011-11-09T14:47:00.000-06:00

After nearly two years of having my bike in mothballs, I was back on the road today. The weather was beautiful today and I greatly enjoyed the ride. My plan is start my year-round riding again, even though fall is fading fast and winter is near at hand. I'll need to figure out my commuting routine, how to handle shleping my stuff back and forth to school and work out some details with my afternoon-oriented school schedule.

But I'm back on the road and it feels great.

Earthquake and the Internet

2011-11-09T14:41:00.001-06:00

As some of you may heard, the normally seismically boring Plain States (that's what I'm calling the part of the country where I live) have had a number of tremors over these past few weeks. The epicenters have been between Oklahoma City and Tulsa and all have scored under 6 on the Richter scale. This past Saturday evening one of them was large enough that we felt it here in Wichita.

I was mostly asleep and was waken by the shaking of our bed. The shaking was minor enough that I thought one of our dogs had broken out of its kennel and was up on our bed busy trying to relieve an itch. The fog cleared in my mind to realize that probably wasn't likely; I then noticed our rafters were popping and cracking like the wind was blowing heavily. This wind, though, was very rythmic in nature and just so happened to be blowing in a way to match the vibrations of our bed.

My mind was still futily trying to figure out what was going on and I asked my wife if she was casuing this rucus. I have long suspected her of having superpowers but she flatly denied responsibilty.

The shaking stopped; she and I stared at each other in the dark, not knowing how to respond.

"That was an earthquake." I knew I was right the moment I said it but how to confirm this? I read a newspaper article yesterday that said over 300 residents of my fair city called 911 to report the news or ask for confirmation. I was almost one of these but realized the operators probably wouldn't appreciate the call and weren't seismological experts. Local TV news? Maybe, but I'd have to get out of bed for that and who knows what they would say. There was a computer right by the bed so I grabbed it and started trolling the internet looking for an authoritative source that would provide details. After several minutes of general searching I tried the United States Geological Survey website and a few more mintues after that found this page.

In less that 10 minutes I knew that yes, there had been an earthquake just minutes before, the epicenter was down in Oklahoma and it was significantly larger than many of the recent quakes in the same area.

The USGS has a great website that put the data up quickly. The internet made the data available quickly. We had our confusion oblviated quickly and fell back asleep.

Published

2011-11-04T07:31:00.001-05:00

Sometime in the past few weeks I officially began my career as recognized academic: my paper got published. The paper in question was one I submitted for the conference in Detroit at the end of July and for reasons that I don't understand it took them roughly three months to get it posted online.

But here it is.

As circumstances would have it, just yesterday I started writing the paper I'll be submitting for the 2012 session of the same conference. The deadline is the end of the month and I've got all the research done; all that's left is the process of assembling the words in a clear and helpful manner. This paper will be on a completely different topic: rather than dealing with wind turbines I'm looking at the effect on the electrical distribution system of the addition of a significant amount of generation. Said differently, when a bunch of people, businesses, and manufacturers install solar panels and wind turbines, how does that affect the operation of the neighborhood electrical system? Traditionally power flows from the big generators to the customers but in this case, if enough people install solar panels, that flow may end up reversed.

(For the power nerds out there, here are the details. Due to the effective limitation in IEEE 1547-2003, inverters can only contribute real power to the distribution feeder. At high penetration levels this could lead to a case where real power is flowing towards the substation but reactive power is still having to be supplied by the substation and/or capacitors on the feeder. My paper seeks to discover if this counter-flow between real and reactive power is a significant issue or not.)

My greatest fear is going through the process of submitting it through the IEEE website. Last year it was a torturous process due to an unspecified problem with how their software interpreted the files I sent over. Now that I'm aware of the problem I'm going to try to get it all squared away before I submit it but there is a lot out of my control and I expect there will be problems once again.

Federal Tax Burden

2011-10-12T08:16:00.000-05:00

The Occupy protests sparked my curiosity yesterday with their "99%" slogan. Specifically, it got me thinking about tax burden in the United States as it relates to income. I did some digging around this morning and came up with some data from the Congressional Budget Office and put together a chart that confirmed by suspicions.

The above chart splits the US population into fifths and shows the percentage of total federal tax dollars each group would be paying under two different taxation systems: a simple flat tax (outer ring) and the 2006 tax structure (inner ring). Again, this is all about actual federal tax dollars, not about marginal tax rates.

The data on the 2006 tax structure comes directly from the CBO. To calculate the (highly) theoretical flat tax revenues, I used the CBO numbers for average income for each income bracket and population for each income bracket. I chose to compare the actual 2006 data to a theoretical flat tax not because I am necessarily a proponent of such a system but because a flat tax is probably the simplest tax structure. Everybody pays a certain percentage of their income, no matter where the money comes from or how much they make. (Because of this fact, in doing my tax revenue calculations, the proportion each income bracket pays is unaffected by the flat tax rate. The total number of tax dollars would be, though.)

Items of note:

Even under a flat tax, the richest 20% of tax-payers will provide over half the tax dollars the federal government collects. The obvious reason for this is that the richest 20% make a lot more money; 10% (for example) of $1,000,000 dollars is a lot more than 10% of $10,000.
In 2006, the richest 20% paid ~70% of all the federal tax dollars.
The poorest 20% hardly paid any of the federal tax dollars in 2006 (~0.8%). Under a flat tax they would pay ~4%; this would be a five-fold increase in their tax rate.
If we moved to a flat tax, everybody's tax rate would go up (each group would be expected to pay for a larger portion of the total tax revenue) except for the richest 20%; their's would do down.

I'll leave it to you to draw your own conclusions.

Results from Measuring Household Temperatures for Most of the Summer

2011-09-19T07:45:00.001-05:00

The temperature measurement system I installed in late June has been running for several months now with only minor problems and with the highs now in the 80s, two of the experiments I've been running over the summer have come to a close and I'd like to share the results.

Let's do the easy one first: attic temperature. A month or so after I got the temperature system going we could see that our attic was getting quite warm on those hot days, often above 130'F. I talked with my wife about it, we did some reading, and decided that adding a bit more ventilation would be good idea. The cost would be minimal and we hoped it would lower the difference between the outside air and the attic. Thankfully it did; the results are below.

The difference between the old and new ventilation is pretty clear: adding the ventilation did lower the temperature difference between the outside and attic air. The statistics show a nine degree cooling in the attic by adding the extra ventilation. (For you statistics nerds, the sample size is ~25 for both conditions, and standard deviation is ~5 degrees.)

The other experiment I ran was based on a conversation I had at a cook-out over the summer. One of the gals there said her father was a HVAC guy and that he recommended keeping a constant set-point during the summer; that is, don't turn the AC off when the house is unoccupied. It was hard for me to believe that this would use the same amount of electricity as a more "conservative" approach of turning it off when gone but I realized I didn't actually have anything more than opinion to back up my assertion. Time to do some science.

I decided to test this theory and added a sensor that would show me when the central fan in our house was running. The fan only kicks on when the air conditioning (or furnace) are on and so this allowed me to measure how long the air-conditioner ran during a given 24-hour period. I semi-randomly changed the programming on our thermostat to either hold a constant temperature all day or to turn the AC back shortly before we got home from work and school. Here's an example of each:

The yellow line at the bottom is the state of the fan: 55'F is on, 15'F is off. For a day when the AC was on a schedule, it turned off around 7am and would come back on around 2:30pm in an attempt to get the house down the temperature by 5pm when we came got home. You can see the purple (kitchen) and cyan (hallway) lines rise throughout the day and then when the AC comes on in the afternoon, begin descending.

When we kept the thermostat constant all day, the AC cycles to keep the temperature in the house at the thermostat set point. The purple and cyan lines stay at an even value throughout the day. (You'll notice the basement sensor is relatively unaffected by the AC. This is why everybody should have a basement if they live in a place that gets hot. Basements are the best.)

After a summer of running both cases, here are the results.

The results are much more mixed than I would expect. I think to make any good conclusions a statistical linear regression would need to be done; I haven't done that yet and probably won't ever get around to it. Its clear that the run-time of the AC is strongly related to the peak temperature for the day. This should be no surprise to anybody. It is less clear which thermostat schedule uses less energy. For the very hot days (> ~105'F) you could make a pretty good case that turning the AC off when you're gone at work will save some energy. For days when the highs are less than 100'F, though, it seems there is very little difference between the two cases.

These results are surprising to me. I would have expected that keeping the AC off for seven or eight hours a day would cause it to run less in the grand scheme of things. It may but the difference isn't huge. I may try repeating this experiment next summer, just to see how it turns out. I guess the good news is that if you're home all day with kids or work you don't have to feel too guilty about having the air-conditioner running the whole time; its not killing your bill much worse than the rest of us.

New Skylight

2011-09-02T14:56:00.003-05:00

For the past few weeks I've been "in-progess" on installing a tubular skylight for the stairwell leading to our basement. There was been no overhead light from the day we bought it which means the stairs were always dark. No longer the case: I give you before and after pictures taken at the same exposure for an apples-to-apples comparison.

Both of these above photos are deceptive; it wasn't that dark before and isn't that heavenly bright now. Such are the limitations of the dynamic range of today's digital cameras. Below is something that is more akin to how my eyes perceive it now.

The installation spanned multiple weeks due an unconventional installation that lead to needing extra parts only available online. These tubular skylights use a dome on the roof to collect sunlight and then channel that light through highly polished and reflective tubes to an opening in the interior ceiling. Due to the stairwell's location, to get the dome on the west side of the roof (where it would get the most sunlight) meant making a very non-direct route for the light to follow from the dome to the ceiling opening.

The hardest part in all of this was determining which extra parts I would need and if the installation would work at all. You couldn't do a test fitting with all the pieces until they arrived and that didn't happen until I knew which parts needed to be ordered. Very chicken and egg. I think if I had all the parts in hand, it wouldn't have taken me more than five hours to complete the project.

This is the second such skylight in our house and we are very happy with them both. When we bought the house there was one in the dining room and we were so happy with it we decided to try this one. I don't know why it took us this long to get around to it but now its done.

I think there's a good chance the hallway will get one as well.

The Midwest

2011-08-23T08:49:00.005-05:00

Shown below is one of many large displays on campus used for things like campus announcements, latest headlines from the news, and weather forecasts including the weather radar for our region.

Note the title on the left: "Midwest Radar".

Note the emphasis on "west" by including Idaho, Utah, Arizona and even a small part of California on the map.

Note the lack of inclusion of many traditional Midwest locations such as the states of Illinois (and of particular note, Chicago), Michigan (including Detroit), Indiana and Ohio.

At least now I know that Kansas is officially in the Midwest. Along with New Mexico.

Storm Damage

2011-08-04T10:23:00.004-05:00

Last night we had a severe thunderstorm roll through the area, causing damage throughout the city. Winds were up to 70 mph, 2.25 inches of rain. We lost power around 10pm and it was eventually restored by 4:30 pm. We had minor damage to our fence but many of our neighbors had much greater damage. Here are a few pictures I took while wandering the neighborhood, waiting for power to come back.

Evidence of the large amount of rainfall: the high water mark of leaves in people's yards. The street would have had to be completely flooded for the water to get this far into the yard.

This street light was pulled down by a limb from a tree limb that fell and landed on the power line for the light.

I'm guessing the damage at this utility pole was the cause of the loss of power in our neighborhood. Our block is fed through these lines and as you can see, several were snapped (again, by falling tree limbs).

Two Nerd Ideas from the Nerd Conference

2011-08-03T06:41:00.002-05:00

As I mentioned previously, I spend the first half of last week in Detroit at a conference for those of us in the power and energy part of electrical engineering. There were many interesting topics discussed, two of which I thought might be interesting to the general public.

The first is not something that is actually a new idea but rather one expressed in a new-ish way. About a year ago it first came to my attention that people outside the electrical power industry probably don't realize that there is virtually no energy storage in our power system. (There are a few exceptions but not enough to matter much.) No energy storage means that whenever you turn on a light in your house, some generator somewhere has to produce a tiny bit more power immediately. There is no way to produce a bunch of energy ahead of time and serve it up as needed later. My professor said it this way: "The electrical energy industry is the only manufacturer whose goods are consumed the instant they are produced."

Using this manufacturing analogy, you can think of any time a light is turned on or an air-conditioner starts up as an "order" being placed to the electrical company for some energy. Unlike every other manufacturer, though, the delivery of the good must be made immediately. None of us would accept a situation where a light switch is flipped and the light turns on minutes, hours, or days later. When we want energy we want it now. Thankfully, physics also makes the same requirement and the energy will either flow immediately or not at all. We'll never get an email from the power company confirming our energy order to run our air conditioner with an estimated delivery date of next week (or the ability to pay extra for two-day shipping).

It is actually possible for the electrical energy companies to fail to provide the right amount of energy in two ways: undersupply and oversupply. Undersupply is something we've all experienced in some way as brownouts and/or blackouts. Actually, a true blackout due to a lack of energy being produced is fairly rare; most of the time when our houses loose power its due to other event like damage to equipment due to a storm. This past winter, though, Texas had some customers in blackout due to a combination of unexpected down-time on some of its generators and unusually cold weather causing customers to turn up their electric heaters.

On the other end of the spectrum are oversupply situations which may not seem as bad. What does it matter if the generators produce more power than we use? The answer to this is a tiny bit technical and it relates to the frequency of the system operation. Without worrying about the details, I'll simply say that all the generators are designed to run at 60 Hz and everything we plug into an outlet expects power at 60 Hz and if more energy is generated than used, the frequency begins to drift up and bad things begin to happen. 60 Hz is the standard and deviation from that standard isn't good for anybody.

All of this I've laid out so far can be summarized in one sentence: at all times, electrical energy supply (from generators) must match electrical energy demand (by consumers). This is the definition of stable system operation. Balancing supply and demand turns out to be very complicated for many reasons, not the least of which is that demand by consumers varies throughout the day and year and that demand can change suddenly. There is much effort being made to predict the amount of electrical energy that will be needed but theses efforts will always be imperfect. (Here's a graph for the California system showing the predicted and actual demand for the day showing this imperfection.) The result of this is that electrical system operators need to always have generators standing by to pick up any extra demand that may suddenly appear. These generators have to be able to respond instantaneously (not in a minutes, or fifteen seconds, or even five seconds) to changes in demand which means they have to be fully up and running responding quickly as the demand on the system changes. What's more, there have to be still other power plants that are not fully online but able to ramp up their output quickly if even larger changes in demand begin to form.

All of this say one simple thing: there are many many more generators in our electrical system than are needed for most days of the year. Many of these generators are not regularly used or do not produce their full output power most of the time. In fact, some of them may only be used during the peak demand for the year, during the hottest days of the summer. Going back to our factory analogy, this is the equivalent of building a factory so that it is able to produce enough goods during the peak Christmas season even though the rest of the year much of the factory will be idle. It all comes back to the fact that there is no energy storage in our system. There is no ability to produce a bunch of energy and put it in a warehouse to be shipped out when needed.

This leads to the second idea I heard at the conference: electric vehicles and their batteries. As these vehicles become more popular and affordable, we are going to start seeing the introduction of non-trivial energy storage introduced to our electrical energy system via the large battery packs in these cars. There is a lot of talk concerning the use of the battery packs in the cars to provide backup power for your house or even electric utility companies paying the car-owners to use that energy for whatever needs the grid may have at a given point in time. There are many interesting ideas floating around out there and all of them will help the system run more efficiently but there are still a lot of details to be worked out; I'm not going to discuss any of them.

I'm going to talk about what we do with the batteries once they have reached the end of life for use in cars. Again, due to physics (and in this case chemistry) batteries that are useless for electric vehicles are far from dead. The figure I heard thrown around was 80%; battery packs in electric vehicles will be removed once, when full charged, they only have 80% of their original design capacity. This means these batteries still have a lot of life left in them, just not for transportation purposes. Many smart people are considering a second-life use for these batteries as distributed energy storage in neighborhoods going by the name "community energy storage" (CES). If these batteries can be repackaged and assembled economically into large battery banks, they could be put out in neighborhoods and act as energy storage distributed all over the grid. From the utility's perspective there are many things that could be done with these battery packs, most of which we as normal people don't care that much about. What we do care about is not losing power and these battery packs could solve that problem; we would have neighborhood-wide battery-backup with the potential to have virtually uninterrupted power.

The other implication of this second life for car batteries is that it may help lower the cost of electric vehicles. If there is a well-established market for "used" electric vehicle batteries, when the time comes to replace those batteries, the car owner may get 80% of the value of a new battery pack by selling the old one. Using made up numbers, if a battery pack costs $10,000 when new but can be resold when its "dead" for $8,000, the net cost to the care owner is only $2,000 for the battery pack in his or her electric car. Batteries in electric cars are a significant cost-driver and having a way to recoup those costs could make electric vehicles more affordable.

Conference in Detroit

2011-08-01T07:17:00.008-05:00

The front half of this past week I spent in Detroit at a conference, the General Meeting for the IEEE Power and Engineering Society. The meeting is held ever year with the purpose of presenting the results from the research work being done by universities and actual implementation of these ideas by energy utility companies. In addition, there are a long list of meetings held by the various committees, sub-committies, working groups and task forces addressing current the areas of concern in the power and energy world. At any given moment there are dozens of meetings taking place and just figuring out which meetings and presentations to attend takes a significant amount of work; there's a paperback-sized conference guide that is (poorly) designed to help attendees navigate all the options.

The content of the conference meetings and presentations was great; it was very helpful to hear work being presented by the authors themselves as well as presentations from people who don't traditionally publish and thus aren't normally directly visible to academics like me. I'll write more about this later but for now you can safely assume it was nerdy in nature.

So until I get that put together, here's a little show-and-tell from the few days I spent there. I would have put this up earlier but the internet access at the hotel was not up to the onslaught of 500 graduate electrical engineering students.

Most of the conference meetings were held in this building, the GM Renaissance Center. Based on my wanderings in the building, it appears to multi-purpose. My guess is that all of the building you can see in this picture is office space, maybe mostly used by GM? The lower levels house a Marriot hotel, retail space, conference rooms and a show-floor for the latest products from GM.

Here's a view of the lower levels. The sky bridge shown here connected the hotel I was staying in with the Marriot hotel in the Renaissance Center where the conference was being held. I barely went outside during the conference, walking back and forth between the two buildings. I know that Detroit is going through some tough times but the view from my daily commute between the two buildings revealed none of that.

The interior of the lower levels was very open with suspended walkways between the five different towers of the building.

Down on the showroom floor I got my first look at the Chevy Volt, the car every electrical engineer wants to own. I took this photo because I noticed that the grill normally used to allow outside air to enter the engine compartment and cool the engine no longer did so; it was entirely decorative and non-functional. The Volt does have a gasoline engine that is used to charge batteries but it is rather small and as you can tell from the picture, it isn't located in the traditional front-and-center location in the engine compartment.

Every morning all the cars in the showroom on the ground floor get a cleaning.

I'm revealing my ignorance of geography but who moved Canada across the strait from Detroit? There is it, just a drive through a tunnel and you're in another country. Windsor, Canada also hosts a very visible Harrah's casino.

More frivolously, the hotel I stayed in seemed to be missing several floors. My room was on the 14th floor and the elevators in the hotel were the fastest I've ever ridden. My guess is it took less than ten seconds to travel from the ground floor to the floor labelled "14", however high up that actually is.

And my pet peeve for the trip: the air conditioner in my room. The hotel had central air rather than an individual unit in each room. This cut down on the noise which is certainly nice but in this case there seemed to be a critical design flaw. The vent at the top dumped could air into the room and the vent at the bottom pulled the air out; in-between was the thermostat. First of all, having the outlet and inlet for the room so close together doesn't encourage circulation of the air throughout the entire room. Secondly, putting the thermostat between the two does accurately measure the temperature of the air as it moves from outlet to inlet but not as much the temperature of the room. Due to these two design choices it was very hard for the AC to do a good job of actually cooling the room. It did a great job of cooling the space between those two vents, though.

Impression Planting

2011-07-22T13:18:00.002-05:00

A friend of mine pointed me towards this video on Youtube of an impressionist doing a speech from Shakespeare in a variety of characters. The video is below but here is my challenge to you: close your eyes, listen to the audio, and see how many of the famous characters you can identify. Once your done, go back and watch the video (where the names of each character are given) and see how you did.

Here's my theory: the impressionist, though highly skilled, is relying on your existing knowledge of the characters to fill out his impression and make it seem more realistic. When you don't know who you're supposed to be thinking of, the impression is not as strong and it is harder to know who he is impersonating. This is not to detract from his incredible performance, just wondering how much of the impression we as audience members are providing ourselves.

Anyway, take the test and let me know which ones you got before looking at the answer key. My wife got three on her own.

Dogs and the Frog

2011-07-06T08:05:00.004-05:00

A frog happened to wander its way into our backyard. Our dogs found it. The poor frog will remember this day for a while (assuming he makes it out alive).

UPDATE: NPR has a great little story about one dog and her dealings with the frogs (or rather, toads) in her life.

Basement Sensor

2011-06-22T07:25:00.003-05:00

My previously mentioned tutor and nerd mentor who enabled me to get started on this project took one look at my code and found the mistake that was keeping the basement sensor from working properly. Making its first-time ever screen appearance, I give you: the Basement Temperature (brown line).

The next problem to solve: why all the "noise" in the data during the second half of the day? We have a few guesses but don't have any firm convictions at this point but we're assuming that something is happening to drive a single measurement to an unreasonable level. The proposed fix is to throw out all unrealistic measurements either based on absolute limits (no temperatures greater than 200'F and less than -30'F) or a relative limit (no temperature change more than 50 degrees away from the previous measurement). This will complicate the code slightly but, hey, that's what nerd friends are for.

Whole-House Fan and Attic Temperature

2011-06-19T16:27:00.004-05:00

A year or so ago we installed an Airscape whole-house fan. The fan is supposed to provide cooling to the house in two ways:

Pulling cool air from the outside into the living area, replacing the air in the house as well as cooling the interior structure of the house.
Displacing the highly heated air in the attic with cooler air from the outside (via the house).

We've been very happy with the cooling the fan provides to the living area of the house but we've had to simply assume that the fan was adequately cooling the attic.

Until now.

With the installation of my super-nerdy temperature measurement system, we now have proof that the fan is doing its job. Last night we turned it on as we we're going to bed, knowing the overnight lows would be cool enough to provide benefit. Looking at the graph, you can see around 10pm when the fan turns on the attic temperature (green) drops pretty quickly.

Nice the see our assumptions were correct.

Nerd Project: Household Temperatures

2011-06-15T06:54:00.004-05:00

I spent most of Saturday crawling around the attic and drilling small holes in the ceiling to complete a project I've been batting around for over a year now. Since we put in our whole-house fan (about a year and a half ago) I've been curious to see what effect the fan would have in reducing the temperature in our attic. This got me thinking about temperature regulation in our house in general: the basement having much smaller changes in temperature during both the winter and the summer, the temperature in the two bedrooms we've don't used and have closed off, how much cooking in the kitchen heats the house, et cetera.

Enabled by a friend of mine who loaned me a critical piece of hardware (because he's even nerdier than me and had extras just laying around his house), I built a little system that measures the temperature in six locations around our house throughout the day. This collection of little programs creates an internal webpage that shows the current temperature for all six locations in the house and every morning creates a graph of the previous day's data and adds a link to that graph on the webpage.

Here's an example from yesterday.

A few items of note:

The dark blue line for our garage shows a little ramp starting around 5:30am. This is when we started the clothes drier which vents into our garage and thus, warms it up. My wife has been interested to see how pronounced this effect is and whether we need to try to modify the venting so it dumps the air outside.
The spike in the purple line a little after 6pm is dinner being cooked. Again, another wife-requested measurement.
You can see attic (green) gets very hot during the day, hotter than the outside temperature. It was too hot yesterday to run the whole-house fan so there was no circulation in the attic. This data seems to suggest that getting some kind of attic fan that ventilates the attic better throughout the day may help in keeping the house cooler. We've got a fair amount of insulation but with the temperature knocking around 130'F during the peak of the day when the outside air is barely at 90'F, it seems like our attic could be acting as a heat source and some of that heat is sure to be leaking its ways back into our house.
Relatedly, the garage is definitely getting warmer than the outside our throughout the day as well. More insulation between the garage and the house would help but an easier solution may be to open the garage doors to allow the air to ventilate. There are plenty of hot days left in the summer to try this.

This system has been running for a few days now with only minor hitches. The biggest bug is that I something is wrong the basement measurements. I know the sensor is good as it was the first (and easiest) one to install and I used it as a proof-of-concept. I've been talking with my nerd-enabling friend and we've got a few ideas I'm going to pursue. I'm also a bit perplexed at how noisy the data is at times. The indoor data (kitchen and hallway) seem very smooth but the rest vary much more than I would expect. Maybe its not noise and the temperatures do vary that much.

Aside from adding a few more sensors (closed-off rooms, maybe the bedroom and the living room), I would also like to add sensors that detect when the whole-house fan is running and when the air-conditioning/furnace fan is running. I hope to get those last two in sometime this summer but I need to figure out the best/easiest way to do it.

I'll write another post soon in a few days detailing the specifics of how the system is put together for any fellow nerd out there who is interested.

Infant Rabbit Update

2011-06-13T07:09:00.002-05:00

After about 24-hours of peace and quiet away from Anise, our little guys seemed to be doing fine (psychological damage aside) and so we decided to release him back into the wilds of our backyard. He spent the first hour or so just huddled in the grass. By the time I was leaving for work he was starting to be a bit mobile and explore around. When I came back from work, he was gone. Here's hoping he survived.

Anise did find a sibling of our friend (also under the deck) and after using it as a toy for a few minutes, managed to kill it. I buried it in the side yard out of Anise's prying nose and paws.

Hopefully this is the last of our infant-rabbit woes. Anise is still carefully exploring the deck for opportunities though she hasn't been barking like she did before. The family may have moved on.

Half-Way

2011-06-09T17:27:00.003-05:00

For several days now whenever we have let Anise outside to run around and get out some of the crazies she has been trying to get under our deck and, failing, barking animatedly. This is the same thing she does when there is a rabbit out of reach (in the neighbors yard, across the street) and she is excited by the possibility but frustrated by the circumstances. This morning she found a way under the deck and shortly thereafter a rabbit did emerge. A very small rabbit.

I have no idea what transpired under our deck this morning. The rabbit that emerged had a small amount of blood around its mouth and one eye appeared to have been permanently damaged. It was making small, pathetic squeaking sounds and was laid out on its back, chest heaving but otherwise unmoving.

What do you do with a half-way dead infant wild rabbit?

We couldn't leave it laying there but we had and have no interest in a baby rabbit for another pet. We choose to give it shelter for the morning, to try to make it as comfortable as possible. We fully expected it to be dead within the hour and made a home that would be easy to bury when the time came. I found a spot in our basement that they dogs can't get to and where its nice and cool. I left two ice cubes in the improvised water tray we were using along with a portion of a leaf of lettuce and small strawberry before I went to school that morning.

This evening when I returned it was still alive. It seemed to be resting and though not moving around in traditional rabbit style, it was clearly still able to move. We're going to try to assess the situation more clearly this evening.

The end game isn't very clear to me. Do we hope to nurse it back to health and set it free? Where is its mother? What if it has been permanently injured in a way that will make it impossible to survive on its own?

Its hard to say what were going to do with this little fur-ball our dog thrust into our lives.

Its not clear from the photo but the little guy is only a few inches long, more like a mouse than a rabbit.

Basil Goes to the Barber

2011-04-27T14:35:00.002-05:00

We've got two outdoor-oriented trips in the near future that our dogs will be joining us on and to cut down on the amount of bramble that Basil collects in his fur, we took him and for a haircut (and bath, ear-cleaning, and nail trimming). We hope this well also help him be more comfortable in the coming hot summer months. Take a look at these very professionally done before-and-after photos.

Just the Simple Truth (Mostly)

2011-04-14T11:40:00.007-05:00

Check out this little article I stumbled upon in my blogger reading today: Just the Simple Truth. For those of you who are a little bit more lazy here's a pertinent part where the author is quoting President Obama: "But after the Democrats and Republicans committed to fiscal discipline during the 1990s, we lost our way in the decade that followed. We increased spending dramatically for two wars and an expensive prescription drug program-but we didn't pay for any of this new spending. Instead, we made the problem worse with trillions of dollars in upaid-for tax cuts-tax cuts that went to every millionaire and billionaire in the country; tax cuts that will force us to borrow an average of $500 billion every year over the next decade." Let's parse this paragraph and look at the basic assertions the President is making in this speech, stripped of their rhetorical ornamentation.

Both parties were involved in "fiscal discipline" during the 1990s. (I believe this is a reference to balanced budget we had for a few years in the late 90s.)

Spending increased significantly during the 2000s thanks to two wars and Medicare part D.

Tax cuts during the 2000s prevented a lot of revenue from being collected from those in the highest tax bracket.

Assuming my interpretation of item one is correct, all of these assertions can be shown to be true.

I don't want to get into the policy angle of whether the extra spending on wars and Medicare was a good idea or the decision to reduce tax income as a whole. Clearly, though, we can say that this combination did not end up working out well in terms of balancing the budget. I know there are plenty of people out there that are philosophically committed to trickle-down economics but in this case the lower taxes rates didn't generate more tax dollars and the budget got way out of balance. Its worth noting that Wisconsin Representative Paul Ryan's assertion that "the more you tax something, the less of it you get" may be true; our budget wasn't balanced through the 2000s, though. It didn't seem to work for that decade.

Here's my main point: assuming the above three facts are true, their validity is a red herring in the larger problem of our national debt. Here's one of many graphs you can find online showing our annual federal deficit over the years, this one in terms of GDP rather than just dollars (to try to level out effects of economic growth).

The simple truth that isn't acknowledged by the President or stated in the article I linked to is that the "fiscal discipline" that resulted in a budget surplus for a few years at the end of the 90s was an aberration. From 2011 all the way back to the 1960s it is clear that this period of time is the only one where we had a balanced budget for any significant length of time. It appears there are a few toe-dips into balanced-budget territory over the last half-century but they are minor and are in no way equivalent to the massive overspending that happened in all the remaining years.

We have a systemic problem. For many years now, our country has not been living within its means and this is a trend that we cannot afford any longer. We need to get serious about our problem and make some hard choices. We can not continue to borrow money for government programs and somehow expect to never have to pay it back. There are good programs that are working well that we will need to cut; there are tax breaks that seem fair and good that will have to be removed. We are so far in debt and it is unreasonable to expect that we can get back to living within our means without making significant sacrifices. Our expectations and lifestyles covertly subsidized through our government in the form of low taxes and expensive government programs are unsustainable.

I'll end with the political finger-pointing. Republicans, you have abandoned any claim of being fiscally responsible based on your performance this past decade. I know you believe in lower taxes but you have to also believe in lower spending as well. In fact, during times of national crisis like the launch of our war on terror, you might even need to increase taxes to pay for the military activity or cut other programs so that our budget can stay balanced. Wars don't pay for themselves and emergency overspending for a few years needs to be followed with determined underspending to pay all that debt back.

Democrats, specifically President Obama, its hard for us to take you seriously as a man determined to balance the budget. You inherited a difficult situation in 2008 and choose to try to spend your way out of it. You and your allies are the ones responsible for the spike in the national deficit at the far right-hand end of the graph. You too need to find a way to generate huge budget surpluses to counter-act the huge spending we just went through.

To both parties I say this: I have a house that is always falling apart, a car that needs repair even more regularly and family members who get sick. I understand that there are months that we need to spend more than we make because of these emergencies that pop up. But you know what happens next month? We spend less to make up for it and replenish any emergency savings that has been depleted. Nobody would let me overspend for 35 out of the last 40 years of my life and call me fiscally responsible. They wouldn't lend me a dime.

Season Change

2011-04-08T05:55:00.003-05:00

I just turned off the gas to our furnace and turned on our the fan to cool the house off this morning. I think its officially the start of the warm season.

I didn't quite get the timing right this year with the amount of kerosene that I bought for our indoor heater: there's about half a gallon left in the tank of the heater. I guess I'm just going to have to burn it off outside; I doubt the house will be cold enough in the next month or two to justify using it.

This "shoulder" period between winter and summer (I hear some people call it "spring") is the best few weeks to live in Wichita. The highs during the day are not astronomical and the lows at night are cool enough to feel a tiny bit chilly. The trees are starting to bloom, grass everywhere is getting green, and I don' need to bundle up to walk the dogs in the morning.

This is much different than summer here, which is oppressively hot and humid. Nobody wants to be outside and its hard to image how people lived here without air conditioners. The overnight lows are often 80'F; it just never cools off. Being in the city probably doesn't help; maybe outside of town where the wind and blow more to cool things off would help.

Renewable Energy

2011-03-26T13:44:00.003-05:00

I'm officially in my first semester of my PhD at Wichita State studying power systems and am taking a class this semester on renewable energy integration. There is debate in some circles regarding the necessity of using these renewable energy sources; much of this debate tend to be centered around the urgency of regulating carbon emissions from traditional power sources.

Another perspective, the one that I think about often, considers the fact that non-renewable energy sources have a severe and obvious limitation: they are not renewable and will run out at some point. All of these fossil fuels are produced by geological processes that we cannot reproduce or replicate in an economically feasible way. These natural resources are a blessing in that we have found ways of relatively easily converting them into a variety of specific refined fuels. The raw resources will run out at some point, though. Unfortunately, the ease of extraction and refinement of fossil fuels have resulted in relatively low costs and promoted the expansion of the use of these fuels. The seemingly limitless supply of fossil fuels leads makes it easier and easier to continue to use them and harder and harder to try to look for alternatives. For decades now Presidents of the United States have got it right in saying that we as a nation are addicted to oil.

The reality, though, is that these fossil fuels will run out at some time in the future and we are so dependent on them that it is hard right now to even imagine our way of living without the pervasive and ready access to fossil fuels. Nearly 100% of our transportation infrastructure from cars to aircraft to cargo ships use only fossil fuels. Most of the electricity in the United States is produced by burning fossil fuels; even electric cars use fossil fuels, albeit in an indirect manner. Even as gasoline fuel prices continue to rise, we in the United States have not reached the point where we are ready to consider serious changes in our lifestyle. We complain; talk is cheap.

To those of you who think the day where we will reach critical levels in our fossil fuel supply is many decade (or even a century) away, well, you may be right. For all of our sake, let us hope that this is the case; we need the time to make these renewable energy sources viable alternatives to the existing system. This brings me to my first point: now is the time to invest (heavily) in these alternative systems. If we wait until the situation is urgent, until we are critically low on fossil fuels to start looking for alternatives, we'll be too late. Gradual change is almost always easier to manage than rapid change. A change this large cannot occur easily and there are many technical and operational challenges that still need to be overcome. As a self-declared representative of all technical professionals in this field I plead with you: give us this time to get this right. This means investing in the technology long before it is profitable and spending the money to research how we need to change our system to accommodate the coming reality.

And again to those of you who think that fossil fuels aren't running out soon I would add this: our society has mis-estimated the bounds of limitless resources in the past. The prevailing opinion for much of the time the Pacific Northwest was settled by white-folk was that both the forest and the fish were effectively infinite. These natural resources seemed so expansive and seemingly immeasurable that there was no effort to moderate their use. The trees and the fish were harvested for many decades until their numbers dwindled so severely that it was clear there were limits to what we thought of as limitless. Now, to preserve these resources for future generations, we try to limit their consumption, especially in the case of trees where it takes several decades to naturally replace what we use.

Considering the non-renewable nature of the fossil fuels we have become highly dependent on and our increasing appetite for them, the day is coming when they will become so expensive so as to be unaffordable. On that day, the lifestyle we in the United States have come to expect will come to a halt. The only way this can be avoided is to prepare now for this eventuality and rebuild our energy infrastructure to be re-orientated around alternative energy sources. The future we want is one where fossil fuels never become expensive because the demand has been radically reduced due to viable alternatives becoming better economic choices. Gasoline would never become prohibitively expensive because nobody will have a use for them; better alternatives will exist. The future we want is one we can create if we choose to start preparing for it now.

National Budget Visualized

2011-02-15T09:52:00.002-06:00

Here's a great visual depiction of the budget President Obama has proposed, put together by the NY Times. Items of notes:

According this this USA today graph, this budget is still larger than the federal income. We are still spending more than we make, like we have for several decades now. Under Obama's budget, we are going to add $1.1 trillion to our debt.
Our interest on the existing national debt is s$474 billion this year, up 14% from last year.
It is clear that the biggest spending is, as I have often asserted, in Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Defense (ignoring the interest on the national debt since we really can't do anything about that except pay it).
Most of the money in this budget is considered "mandatory" spending, meaning that previously enacted legislation (such as the Social Security Act) requires a certain level of spending. New legislation could be passed to overturn these mandatory spending requirements (such as a End Social Security Act, to make up an example) but the money funding the programs created by previous legislation is not up for grabs as a part of the regular budgeting process.
The big spender not in the mandatory spending pool (called "discretionary" spending) is defense spending. Defense spending is the only one of the Big Three that can be changed without passing additional legislation.
During the Bush years it was common for the normal budget to be augmented by "emergency" spending bills to fund the wars. This money is outside of the normal budget process and thus does not show up in the kind of graph the NY Times has put together. I don't know whether President Obama has any emergency spending legislation he is going to propose or not.
Finally, just to be clear, the President doesn't officially get to set the budget for the year; he can only sign or veto a spending bill that Congress passes. Obama's budget is an opening bid in what will be probably a long negotiation before a final bill is arrived at that all parties can live with.

Short

2011-02-04T18:04:00.003-06:00

Below is a fantastic little short movie that I'm watching on a regular basis now because it reminds me so much of where I grew up and what I love about it.

Growing is Forever from Jesse Rosten on Vimeo.

This Week in the Weather

2011-02-04T17:55:00.003-06:00

A week ago it was 70 degrees outside. Today the high was 28 degrees. In the past week we had several inches of snow, some relatively fierce winds, and two days when Wichita State University cancelled classes. One of my professors who has been at the school 25 years says he can only remember one other time the school has closed due to weather.

It has been a cold week.

On the upside, pictures of the dogs in the snow are always kind of fun.

Seen today in the neighborhood

2011-01-21T17:39:00.002-06:00

Tron: Legacy

2010-12-24T12:15:00.002-06:00

I convinced my brother in-law that we should go see "Tron: Legacy" while he was in town recently and we choose to lay out the big bucks and go see it at the newly opened IMAX. Oh, and it was in 3D. The only 3D movie I'd seen before this was "Avatar" and while it was nice, I wasn't convinced that it was worth the extra three or four dollars. This opinion was reinforced by commentary I had read around the web that "Avatar" had the best implementation of 3D as it was actually filmed with two cameras while most of the other 3D movies had been made so in post-production.

I didn't have high expectations of "Tron: Legacy" and was just hoping for an entertaining show: lots of cool looking things on screen with the thinnest of plots to hold the excitement together. Seeing it in 3D IMAX was a novelty, I reasoned, something new to try out. My preconceptions were more or less accurate but were understatements of the reality. "Tron: Legacy" in 3D IMAX an experience more than a movie. I can't say that the plot was superb or the extremely well-written but nearly every other aspect of the film is excellent. The use of 3D is very well done and adds much to the movie, much more than I remember in "Avatar". The visuals are stunning, integrate well with and strongly develop the style of the movie, and are exceedingly enjoyable. Costumes and sets were similarly unique and impressive.

The surprise to me, though, was the the music and sound. This was more than good use of orchestral scoring; it was an embrace of synthesized, manipulated, stretched and compressed alteration of traditional music into a unique sound that, again, adds so much in defining the style and feel of the whole film. I don't feel that the audio overshadowed the visuals just that they were not neglected in light of all the effort of making a visually stunning movie. I'm tempted to buy the score of the film because it was so unique and powerful.

I don't think "Tron: Legacy" would have struck with me so deeply if I hadn't seen it first in IMAX 3D. If you have the option of seeing it that way I would recommend it; its probably the only way I would recommend this movie. In this way the movie is a work of art; the experience of seeing it will not be replicated well onto a more conventional screen and even less so into a home setting. It will be like the difference between an original oil and a picture of the same work in an art textbook.

Its hard to compare this movie to others because it is so much more of an experience than simply a movie. There are much better films out there that don't derive their value from special effects or visual spectacle. But its hard to say that "Tron: Legacy" is better or worse than any of these because its value is so much in the presentation. Pick your favorite movie and even if you were able to see it again on the big screen right now, it would be a completely different experience than "Tron: Legacy".

Maybe that's the best way to think about it. "Tron: Legacy" has brought back something special to the movies. You will either see it in its fullest form or you won't but there won't be any second chances. Once it leaves the theater, there really won't be any way to get the full meal deal. Its like performance art in that way; a one-time experience that can't be replicated. If you can afford the $12 to $15 per ticket I strongly recommend that make an effort to go see this. You won't walk away with inner contemplations about the plot or characters but you can't help to be entertained.

It is the best movie of little consequence I have ever seen.

100% Official

2010-12-16T09:33:00.003-06:00

As of yesterday, I have completed all the requirements for my Master's degree. I took my final test of the semester (Statistics) and received confirmation from the graduate school that all my paperwork was in order and that my thesis had been officially accepted.

The graduation ceremony was this past Sunday and I attended but had chosen not to walk, mainly because I'm staying on for my PhD making the ceremony very anti-climactic. I attended the ceremony to see a good friend of mine get his PhD and while waiting for the ceremony to start, I was thumbing through the program. There I was, listed as completed my Master's along with my thesis title. Even for me, a person who doesn't care much for ceremony, this was a little weird. I felt like I should run up on stage and get in line will all the other Master's students. I was literally just a few hundred feet away from being able to participate in the ceremony.

For me now, school will just continue for a while. Classes start up again in mid-January and I'll be attending the normal three lecture classes, just like I have for the past five semesters. Looking at my estimated schedule for the next few years, it doesn't look like things start to change much until spring 2011 when I begin taking my dissertation hours. Each semester from that point on I spend more and more time on my official schedule working on my dissertation until I complete it in the spring of 2013. At least that's how thing stand now; all of this is subject to change and probably this spring I'll be submitting more paperwork to get this schedule of mine officially approved as worthy of PhD work.

There is a hiccup that I already know of in my schedule. The Engineering and Education departments recently got together to form a program specifically geared towards graduate students in engineering who plan on a career in academia, like me. By taking four specific graduate level education classes, I will be able to earn a Certificate in Engineering Education. The problem: the engineering graduate department may not recognize any of those education courses as "counting" towards earning a PhD. This means that if any engineering student wants to earn this certificate, he or she will have to take these four courses on top of the normal course load for a PhD. Nothing is completely decided yet but it seems counter-productive to me to working across departments like this to get the program in place and then to construct additional barriers to prevent students from actually participating in the program. Methinks the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing.

You Balance the Budget

2010-12-03T17:00:00.002-06:00

In terms of posts to this blog, I've written a lot about the Federal deficit and balancing the budget. This is one more item on that list.

The New York Times has an interactive feature on their website that allows everyday normal people like us to take a stab at balancing the budget and getting our national debt under control. The interface is simple: there are a list of options that each make a dent in the budget problem and you go through and check the ones that get you to a balanced budget. Its easy to use and gives you a very tangible handle on what it will take to make our federal government fiscally responsible.

Go ahead and give it a try. Spread the word. Start thinking seriously about what it will take for our government to start acting like grown-ups when it comes to money.

Cranberry Sauce

2010-12-01T06:20:00.002-06:00

Do you make your own cranberry sauce for Thanksgiving (or any other holiday meal) or do you buy it in a can? If you don't make your own cranberry sauce you really should. Its just too easy and too fun to pass up. You can buy a bag of cranberries for a few dollars, add some sugar and water and heat it all up until the berry begin to burst. That's right, I said burst; its like making popcorn with fruit! (There are plenty of more detailed recipes out there if you feel you need more detailed instructions but really, its that simple and hard to get wrong.)

Sure, its cheaper, easier, and faster to buy the sauce in a can but the two don't really even compare. Unless you're really strapped for cash and/or time, spend the extra two bucks and fifteen minutes to make the sauce yourself. Or better yet, get some quality kitchen time with a family member or friend and recruit them to do it.

Fresh cranberries will be readily available in the US for several more weeks so don't wait. I'm betting once you try it, you'll never go back. I haven't.

First snow of the season

2010-11-17T15:37:00.003-06:00

Its not accumulating here in Wichita but it is snowing. See for yourself

Master Hardy

2010-11-14T17:36:00.003-06:00

It's all but official. I defended my thesis this last Friday and now just have some editing, probably a bit more formatting, and hopefully just a tiny amount of paperwork to do before I have earned my Master of Science in Electrical Engineering from Wichita State. Oh, and I need to pass my classes this semester as well. On a practical level things don't change much for me, though. I'm continuing on with my PhD so I have many more semesters to go before this is all done.

We'll, here's a mostly completed, almost perfect draft version of my thesis. Feel free to read, enjoy, and ask questions. Or you can just smile and now and not worry about it. Whatever.

Basil's new trick

2010-10-23T07:58:00.003-05:00

We've been working with Basil to train him to go and get the paper in the morning; we anticipate this trick being very handy for the coming winter months. Here's a demonstration from this morning:

The word is spreading!

2010-10-12T10:36:00.002-05:00

David Leonhardt must have been reading my blog because, on a nationally syndicated radio program (Marketplace), echoed nearly exactly (almost verbatim) what I've been saying about what it will take to balance the budget. We've got the make big cuts in one of the following: Medicare, Social Security, or defense and/or raise taxes. The most politically fleasible option will probably involve modest changes to many or most of these.

The message is getting out! You heard it here first (maybe)!

Everyday Amazing

2010-10-07T16:48:00.002-05:00

That's how I'd describe this video; its an example of everyday amazing. There are cooler videos out there, I'm sure and other people have done similar things but here is a pretty normal looking guy who wants to do something at least slightly extraordinary: make a spacecraft. And he does. And captures some footage that can best be described as awesome in the traditional sense of the word.

Watch it full screen in a dark room. Prepare to be amazed.

Homemade Spacecraft from Luke Geissbuhler on Vimeo.

Before Congress gets back to balancing the budget...

2010-10-04T06:32:00.002-05:00

I know I just wrote about this a few posts ago but one of my favorite podcasts (Planet Money) mentioned a report that effectively gave a receipt showing how are federal tax dollars are spent. The categories they chose to track seem a bit arbitrary but its worth taking a look at. And the top 3: Defense, Social Security, Health Insurance.

The report also referenced a few other great websites that try to get a handle on the same data. WhatWePayFor.com lets you plug in your salary and generate a dollar-amount break-down for your tax bill and the National Priorities Project has a Tax Day page that does a similar thing in less detail.

Health Insurance and Me

2010-10-01T19:32:00.002-05:00

I've ranted about this before: I have no love for the health insurance I currently have. There are many things to complain about but the one that is troubling me most lately is the plan's attempt to portray its bugs and difficulties as features; I'm talking about consumer-driven health-care. The theory behind these plans place the health insurance policy-holders in the role as consumer and thus place the responsibility of controlling health-care costs in said policy-holders hands. By placing the burden on the policy-holders to make the financial choices on how the health-care dollars are spent, a more direct relationship between those paying for the care and those receiving the care is formed. Financial self-interest becomes a factor in making health-care choices and the policy-holders/patients don't freely spend money when they think of it as theirs rather than the insurance companies.

I like the theory but the way my insurance is set up now it utterly defeats any attempt to make this work in practice. I found this out again when I tried to price out the total cost I will have to pay for a minor procedure I have soon. Due to specialization, fragmentation, multiple providers and a complicated billing system, it is practically impossible to determine the cost for this procedure before I actually get a bill in the mail. I can get a price for the doctor performing the procedure and I can get a price for procedure (if its at the only in-network hospital here in town but it could be at any other number of smaller clinics who charge their own prices). I can't, though, get a price for the anesthesiologist who will be helping during the procedure because nobody, not the doctor, not the hospital, knows who that will be anytime closer than a day or two before the procedure. Getting the incomplete prices I did took me three or four hours of phone calls.

To state it plainly, my health insurance company forces me to go shopping for the my health care providers and when I do, I find out that nothing has price tags. It is virtually impossible to try to manage my health care costs the way my insurance company says I should. The health insurance company wants to make it seem that by shopping around I can control my health care costs but I know this isn't true and it is hard to imagine that health insurance executives don't know this as well. Besides, would you choose a surgeon, radiologist, or oncologist you had never met to perform a one-time medical procedure because he or she was the most affordable? I can't think of anybody who would unless they had no choice. And don't even get me started on in- and out-of network, deductibles, co-insurance, co-pays, and the cyclical billing routine between medical service provider, insurance company and patient.

I've made this challenge before and I'll make it again: I double-dog dare you to try to find out the price you will actually have to pay for any given medical procedure a priori. Unless it is not much more than a simple visit to your everyday doctor where no testing is done (and what doctor do you know that doesn't want to "run a few tests" while you're there) you will not be able to get a price of any value before you actually go in.

At least I can't. Not one accurate enough to be useful, that is.

Recently heard on campus...

2010-09-15T16:23:00.000-05:00

"I'm addicted to feeding the squirrels."

More on Federal Spending

2010-09-07T11:44:00.006-05:00

I recently found an interesting report outlining how the income and expenditures of the federal government broken out by state. In partcular, the report highlighted the fact that there are some states in the union that historically consume more tax dollars than they generate; they are subsidized by the country as a whole. Conversely, there are states that generate more in taxes than they receive from the government.

Take a look at the report here and see where your favorite state (or maybe the states you love to hate) stack up. The most important columns are the last two showing the received-to-spending ratio (values over $1.00 mean the state was subsidized, values less than $1.00 mean the state did the subsidizing) and the ranking of the state in terms of dollars received.

I'll leave it as an exercise to the reader to decide whether citizens should be proud or not of their states' abilities to attract federal spending. Some call it "bringing home the bacon" and they vote based on who they think can bring the most money to the state. When it comes to tax dollars, though, its a zero-sum game; federal dollars flowing into the state have to come from somewhere and it will largley be taxes collected from another state. This is another way to look at federal taxes as wealth redistribution: money moving from "rich" states to "poor" states (or something like that).

First Day

2010-08-24T10:22:00.003-05:00

My first lecture has come and gone as a instructor at Wichita State University. It went well. Despite the late hour of the class (5:35pm to 6:50pm) the students seemed awake and participating. We got through the introductory material and started into the content; I was even able to put up the first homework assignment (though it won't officially be due for over a week). I made one blunder in assigning an in-class problem which turned out to be much more difficult than I realized when I opened my mouth. I caught it after a minute or so and was able to call it off before I did too much educational damage. At least that's what I'm telling myself right now. Moral of the story: stick to the notes I've prepared for myself, particularly when it comes to examples and practice problems.

Oh, and I accidentally left my travel mug of water in the lecture hall overnight. It was still there when I came by early the next morning.

I still haven't received the official contract for teaching this class, though. Its the only thing holding me back from being 100% officially hired.

Windows

2010-08-20T05:45:00.005-05:00

Two days out of the week I have long days at school, about twelve hours on campus. While I was waiting for my last class of the day I noticed the following. I've speeded up the video to make the effect the wind was having on these windows more obvious.

The last part of the clip is slowed down to normal speed so that I could provide some context to the problem. The windows are probably five feet tall and each pane is probably three or four feet wide. The hallway is a hundred feet or so. This is a lot of glass that doesn't seem to be solidly attached to the rest of the building. I have the distinct impression that the plate screwed into the window frame shown in this clip was added after installation.

Its almost 100% official...

2010-08-18T20:23:00.004-05:00

Yesterday I got a few more keys to add to the growing ring, today I was given another and received training on how to use the projector system in the room I will be using for lecture.

Then there's this little excerpt from the course catalog listing for this semester:

Now all I need is for the last bit of paperwork to go through giving me access to the part of the computer system where I enter grades and I'll be set.

Defense, Social Security, Health Care

2010-08-11T06:30:00.003-05:00

I was in a discussion with a friend recently about the national debt, a topic that we are both concerned about. I was trying to point out that most of the federal budget is being spent on just a few things but didn't have the numbers in front of me to confirm this. Now I do.

The chart comes from Wikipedia; they used publicly available data.

There are three general areas of federal spending that make up a significant portion of the federal budget: defense, Social Security, and health care (Medicare and Medicaid). (Since this is 2008 data, there is no mention of the new health insurance reform and it will several years before we have data on how much that is actually costing us). The total of these three is 58% of our budget. If you throw in welfare and other "non-discretionary" spending the total comes in at 67%.

If we are serious about being fiscally responsible we need to look at cutting spending and when cutting costs, you don't look at the small things first. Completely eliminating, say, the funding for the Department of Justice will not make much of a difference in terms of limiting spending. Killing NASA won't help out much either. The federal government is involved in many, many, programs but when you get look at the data, most of these spend very little in the scope of the entire federal budget.

Here's my point: if you get in a discussion about balancing the federal budget just remember the big three. Make it a mantra. Defense, Social Security, Medicare & Medicaid. Don't let anybody get you off topic with talks of killing NASA or ending the Department of Education. Everybody has a part of the federal government that they love to hate and often political motivations can hide behind the mask of fiscal responsibility. (This is the reason I don't like including the "welfare and other non-discretionary" spending in the total; everybody has an opinion about welfare.) These programs are small fry's and killing them won't really help us out any.

To balance the budget we have to choose to confront the reality that most of our spending is in programs and that most people see as non-negotiable. Even my wife's very conservative mother, a woman who wants a smaller federal government, lower taxes, and a balanced budget, does not want to see significant cuts to the entitlement programs of Social Security and Medicare. Reality is unforgiving in this regard, though. The big three need be smaller. Defense, Social Security, Medicare & Medicaid.

How are we going to get from there to here? What sacrifices will you make to bring the help bring the country back into financial balance? The federal government has for some time now been balancing its budget by borrowing and we all know that this can't go on forever. The sooner that we get serious about a legitimately balanced budget, the sooner we can start paying down the debt. In 2008, we spent 9% of our federal dollars just on interest for the debt.

Defense, Social Security, Medicare & Medicaid.

We are the federal government. Don't simply blame the politicians for making politically expedient choices and avoiding unpopular ideas like cutting Social Security benefits. These ideas are untenable only because we, the people who elect them, don't want to make the choice for ourselves. If cutting Social Security benefits had our strong support then there is no doubt elected officials would openly advocate for it. We, the electorate, have to be willing to sacrifice if we expect our representatives to make the changes in law that will be required to balance the budget. Don't blame them; we gave them the job.

Defense, Social Security, Medicare & Medicaid.

Watering

2010-08-09T19:36:00.002-05:00

My wife just got done watering our maple tree in the backyard. It is a full, mature tree but due to the weeks of high heat (highs at 95'F or greater, lows of 80) and no rain, the tree has started to shed its leaves. The backyard has a pool of green, dry, crinkly leaves around the tree; it looks quite sad.

Teaching

2010-08-06T05:48:00.003-05:00

I found out yesterday around lunch time that I will be teaching my first course at WSU this fall, CS 194 Intro to Digital Design. The appointment comes pretty close to the start of the school year (two weeks away) and so I'm going to be scrambling a bit to try to get prepared. Thankfully the professor who teaches it normally has mercifully volunteered her notes and homework so me to use/copy/modify.

The content of the course is not difficult for me to understand and I'm hoping my students will be able to catch on relatively quickly. The bigger struggle for me will be the less direct issues in teaching: pace, proper amounts and difficulty of homework and tests, classroom management, etc. This will be especially true given that this course will consist largely of freshman in their first semester at college.

For now I'm busy trying to re-learn the specifics of the material that I've forgotten and formulate the early lectures, at least in my head. This should be an adventure.

While I've been gone

2010-07-28T13:11:00.004-05:00

This month has been extremely busy with trips to Oregon, Colorado and Missouri and I'm just now working on getting life back in order. Until I figure out what (if anything) I'll have to say from these trips, here is a little gem from my time in Missouri. This is a sign at a state park we stayed at; what does it mean?

When I saw it I had just realized the camp ground had no cell phone coverage and so I thought that it was pointing the way to a magic location where cell phones would work. It wasn't.

Puppy Surgery

2010-07-02T15:05:00.004-05:00

What you see above is a bit of grass seed that has been aggravating one of our dogs, Basil, for the past few weeks. When we first noticed the problem, the only symptom was Basil licking between his toes on one paw. We investigated and found that a knot of fur and grass seed had formed there and with a quick flick of the scissors, thought we had solved the problem.

A few days later we noticed he was still licking and further investigation revealed a tumor-like enlargement between those same two toes. It didn't look like a blister and early attempts to lance and drain it produced no fluid; it seemed to be more like a callous than an abscess.

But it kept growing, slowly. We called Katie's mother, a small animal vet, and her over-the-phone diagnosis was that it was an abscess where something had gotten embedded in his skin and was festering away, motivating Basil to try to fix the problem through licking. We speculated that probably some grass seed was the culprit. Our problem: the wound didn't act like an abscess that could be drained and the offending particle removed, it was just too solid.

Last night I looked at it again and saw a long dark spot near the surface of the enlargement and the "tumor" did appear to be more fluid than before. I soaked Basil's foot in epson salt while Katie rounded up the alcohol, swabs, and sterilized a sewing needle. We dried off the foot and I poked the blister. Some blood came out but very little (if any) of the expected pus which would have indicated an infection by a foreign body and confirmed Katie's mom's theory.

We gently squeezed the sore and tried to explore and coax anything out of it but we got nothing but more blood. I talked with my co-surgeon and we decided we needed to cut it open and go after it while we could. Katie sterilized a razor blade, I cleaned the area with alcohol. She handed me the blade and while distracting Basil with puppy treats, I gently cut across the surface of the sore.

A little more blood but no obvious culprit. Another deeper cut and still no sign of anything wrong other than the obvious damage I was doing myself. Basil is a laid back dog and he normally doesn't object to our ministrations, even when we are doing things he doesn't care for, such as cleaning his ears or trimming his nails. He wasn't fighting us yet and I didn't want to make things worse but I was convinced that cutting just a bit deeper would yield results.

I did; it did. The point of the seed popped up through the blood and I grabbed it out with tweezers. We cleaned the area with alcohol, applied a topical anti-biotic, and bandaged the wound. Basil got more puppy treats and a chance to sleep in our room as both a reward for being a good patient and a half-hearted attempt to make sure he didn't lick the surgery site. This morning we redressed his foot and things appeared to be healing well. With the antagonist gone, Basil seems to be feeling much better and isn't lick his paw any more. As of right now the pocket in his skin is closing up nicely and the "tumor" is receding.

Katie's mom was impressed with our work and I'm glad we were able to get it out so easily. I bet Basil would enjoy a local anesthetic next time, though. Any ideas on how to get something like that?

New Site Design

2010-06-29T20:36:00.002-05:00

I had a bit of free time on my hands and accidentally discovered Blogger's easy to use site designer and with a little bit of fiddling, gave the blog a new look. And, because my wife asked, the background picture behind the title is mine, taken in our unimpressive backyard.

How to...

2010-06-26T08:37:00.004-05:00

Katie got this little container for holding plastic bags from Wal-Mart yesterday. We hang onto our plastic bags for dog-related purposes and they tend to clutter up in the pantry closet. This cheap container is supposed to hold all those bags and even has a (faux?) stainless steal finish.

Installation is easy and straight-forward and instruction are only necessary if you've never done anything like this before. Two drywall anchors and two screws. Done in less than five minutes.

The instructions do have some comedic value, though. Check out the list of needed tools, shown in universal-style images.

That's right. In addition to a screwdriver, drill, hammer, and pencil you'll also need to be a human male.

Water Dogs

2010-06-18T14:22:00.002-05:00

Both our dogs are English Springer Spaniels, a breed whose original purpose was to help in hunting water fowl. Its not surprising then, that they love water and the only things that make baths unpleasant is all that soap and shampoo. Last year we purchased a large inflatable pool for them to play in and that lasted a week or two until they popped it. It also took much more water to fill than I expected.

This year we went with the cheaper, smaller pool and bring it out on hot summer days to help cool them off when outside. Our dogs are very different in temperament and I think the following two movie clips will make this clear.

Anise:

Basil:

Attic Fan

2010-06-18T05:29:00.002-05:00

This past spring, in an attempt to save ourselves some money, hassle, and discomfort, we decided to purchase and install an attic fan. Katie had experience with one growing up and insisted that if we were going to do this it had to be quiet so we ended up on one provided by Airscape. As with my home projects, the install took longer than I thought but once it was in and running we were loving it. Instead of messing with multiple box fans that didn't seem to work very well we open a few windows and flip a switch. The fan pulls in the cool air from outside and shoves the hot air in the house and attic outside.

The fan ceases to be useful, though, when things don't really cool down at night very much. We knew that the fan wouldn't be able to be used all summer but based on historical data on the temperatures here in town, it seemed it would still be worth it the rest of the year. The summer heat has seemed to hit a bit early this year and already the night-time lows are 78'F at our house; there's no sense in exchanging one set of hot air with another so the fan is staying off.

Other than this not so small complication, we have been big fans of the fan. For people who live in places where the night-time lows are more reasonable, I can whole-heartedly endorse the product. Where I grew up, we didn't have air-conditioning and this worked out fine most of the year but a fan like this would have made all the difference and saved my father from same box-fan routine we used to do here.

Helping with the move

2010-06-14T05:33:00.002-05:00

Our friends were making a move this last Wednesday and I volunteered to help them out. I have no classes during the summer leaving my schedule very flexible and I was glad to do what I could. Unfortunately, most of the working world does not have weekdays off so when we started in the morning at 9:30am, there was four of us. By lunch there was just three. The morning turned into a long day but by early evening we were starting to see more help show up, thankfully.

As the sun was setting a group of guys was trying to manipulate a sleeper-sofa down a tight squeeze in the stairwell to the basement. We were very close to making it work but just couldn't get it to fit. After tearing up the door jamb, putting a small hole in the wall of the stairwell, and scuffing a big of paint off the other stairwell corner, we gave up and decided the sofa would have to live upstairs. We gathered to eat a quick bite before finishing for the evening and I took stock of the man-power we had present and came to a conclusion: as tired as we were, we needed to move the piano tonight. We probably weren't going to have any more help at a future date and needed to get it down while we could.

I made my case to my friend the home-owner and I could tell that he wasn't thrilled with the idea as he was as tired as I. Using what little skills of persuasion I have, though, I was able to convince him to at least give it a shot. It was the last item to be moved and if we could get the piano moved, we could claim victory for the day. Six guys, one big, heavy, wooden box.

Loading it into the truck was not too difficult, though one of the casters was broken so we lifted it the entire way. Once in the truck we started the short ride back to the new place.

Half a block from the house, at the last turn of the ride, the most unbelievable event occurred. The piano, which we had not tied down, came flying out of the bed of the truck. It came crashing to the ground but, amazingly, stayed more or less in one piece. I was in the vehicle behind the fateful truck and I have never seen anything like this. The piano started to lean to one side, the top of the console got over the edge of the truck, and somehow, the caster wheels ended higher up than any other part of the piano as it seemed to jump and flip towards the street.

We all stopped, got out of the cars, and stared for a minute, still in shock over what happened. I looked back at the road on the corner we had just turned and couldn't see any of Wichita's famous potholes, drainage troughs, or uplifted pavement. It was as smooth as roads get around here. How did this happen?

We loaded the piano back into the truck and, after traveling a few hundred feet, into the house. A quick glance while walking by the piano and you wouldn't think it had fallen to the road but even the most cursory inspection showed not only deep scuff marks and gouges in the wood but also that the keyboard was uneven, elevated, and none of the keys could be moved. The piano was no beauty to begin with but now it couldn't even be played.

Epilogue:

Katie and I rode over to the new house the other day on our way home from a farmer's market to see how the unpacking was going. We found out that, as miraculous as the flying piano incident was, even more miraculous is that our friends were able to easily fix the piano and every key works! The only problem with the keyboard was that the keys had lifted out of their guides and were resting on top of them rather than sliding between them. Simply lifting the keys and resting them back into place solved the problem. The piano needs to be tuned, of course, and all the beauty marks are still there but the instrument functions the way it was designed.

June 5th

2010-06-06T08:06:00.002-05:00

June 5th 2009 was the day I was laid off at Cessna. That morning I was told by my supervisor that I was being let go and after that day I never went back to my desk again. It was not a happy day.

June 5th 2010 at 4:30am my first niece was born to my wife's sister in Enid, OK. She had a high risk pregnancy and was induced so as not to prevent any complications. (I assume that was the logic, anyways.) She checked-in to the hospital on Friday morning but for a variety of reasons did not progress as quickly as was expected. As seems to be the case for every mother I meet, the labor was lengthy and Maylin Brooke wasn't born until nearly twenty-one hours later.

Thankfully, other than the long labor everything went smoothly. The epidural helped that as well.

I hope to be a father some day but for now, I'm an uncle, now three times over. This June 5th was much better than the last.

Escape!

2010-06-02T07:24:00.002-05:00

Last night Anise had a brief night on the town. I had left the door between our garage and the backyard open as well as the garage door to help cool off our garage. I forgot to close them, Katie let Anise out into the backyard, and she took advantage of the opportunity to explore the neighborhood. Thankfully somebody managed to grab her long enough to read her collar and give us a call. By the time I headed out on my bike, I could see her up the street, playing with the dogs of some of our friends. As best we can tell, she just kind of took herself for a walk along the route we normally go. She came right away when I called and raced me back home, enjoying her freedom and crazily zig-zagging down the street in front of me. When we got her inside she just kept running around the house; she was completely wired and it took half an hour for her to calm down enough to put her to bed.

She appeared to have a lot of fun and if it weren't for the fact that she lacks complete common sense when it comes to cars (and many other things) then I don't think we would have been very worried. Owning pets is like being parents in many small ways and we had a small parenting scare last night.

The Other WSU

2010-05-28T08:28:00.005-05:00

I just got back yesterday from a conference at Washington State University in Pullman, WA. Wichita State is part of a university/industry research organization called PSERC. Twice a year the group holds a conference where new research proposals are made, updates and reports on existing projects are presented, and general networking/collaborating takes place in spades. The conferences are not very large, perhaps 50 or so individuals were there this time (though I was told that this was a bit lower than usual).

I felt very fortunate that I got to attend and thoroughly enjoyed the time. Just being a part of the conference made me feel like a "big-boy" researcher even though my part in presenting findings from the project I've been working on this past semester was very small, I had a display in the poster session. This type of presentation is exactly what it sounds like and is very similar to the grade school science fair in format, just without the classic baking-soda-and-vinegar volcano. In the world of academic prestige, being a part of a post session is the lowest form of data presentation but for graduate students in PSERC, its the only option we have available.

There were two great benefits for me in attending. One was the previously mentioned networking value. Though I was slightly sick and had a sore throat which made talking difficult, I was able to meet a fair number of other students and some of the other researchers both in academia and industry. Assuming I am able to attend more of these conferences in the future, I expect these relationships to become increasingly useful in staying connected to the current state of the art. This brings up the second key value in the conference: I now have a much better and more concrete understanding of what topics are of interest to those in the know and where the research effort is being made. This not only makes me feel more connected and a part of the academic community but will be of great value as I go forward and try to define the scope of my PhD dissertation.

Details from the conference are probably not worth getting into here so for now I'll simply leave you with some slightly interesting pictures I took while in Pullman, mostly of sights seen on campus.

I'll leave it to you to judge the validity of the labeling in public places at Washington State.

The area and the campus as a whole is very hilly and covers a lot of space. Just walking around campus would be a great form of exercise.

You know you're in a Northwest college town when the VW buses start showing up.

The community garden near campus. A great idea and use of space.

Right at the edge of campus. I think they've got their demographic nailed.

Why I don't like Quicken

2010-05-22T11:47:00.005-05:00

After talking with a good friend the other night I got inspired to look into upgrading our old version (2005) of Quicken to the newly re-designed Quicken Essentials 2010. I talked with my wife about it and we decided that the money would be well spent since we would be able to electronically access all of our financial statements and Quicken had a converter that would transfer over all our old data.

After ten or so hours on the phone with technical support, I can attest that the former is wonderfully true and the later is maddeningly not. A converter is included with the software but in our case, it doesn't seem to work the way it should. I've called Quicken four times, each time addressing a different symptom of the bad conversion and each time the only slightly helpful technical support person has run me through the same steps of trying to re-import my data, come to the conclusion there was a problem with my file, and escalate my issue to some higher ups that may get back to me eventually. This process usually takes about an hour or so on the phone. So far, I've only been contacted once by these mysterious higher ups and, thankfully, they were able to clear up that particular symptom. I've yet to hear from them the for two of the other problems.

This last time I called things ended differently. The technical support person said there was no fix for my problem and that I could either use the software in its broken condition or I could ignore all the historical data from my old version of Quicken and start with a clean slate. I couldn't believe what I was hearing so I asked a few clarifying questions and repeated that the "solution" to my problem was not really a solution at all. He agreed that this was the case.

From a business stand-point this is hard to understand. Intuit, the maker of Quicken, is the only one that knows the format of my old data and it is the only one that can migrate this data to any other format. It has me locked in to their software right now and is in a perfect position to keep me there by supporting the transition to their newest version of software. But they have decided that they don't want to support me in this transition, that they want me to start over with my financial record-keeping. This makes two points abundantly clear to me:

Intuit doesn't believe in customer support. I'm having trouble migrating my data from one version of their software to another version and they aren't able to help me make this work. I've invested ten or so hours of my time with them to get the data converted and they aren't able to get the job done.
If I'm going to lose all my historical data, then I am free to choose software from any of Quicken's competitors and in light of the above point, I'm more inclined to choose something besides Quicken. Not only are they not able to persuade me to stay but they seem to be encouraging me to take my business elsewhere.

So we did. We have resigned ourselves to losing our historical data (sad but not the end of the world) and have found another program that is better in nearly every way, iBank 3. We haven't used it much yet but so far, it seems to do everything we need including some things Quicken didn't do very well or at all. We'll be getting a refund from Intuit and aren't looking back.

Closing remark: I can't recommend highly enough that you avoid Quicken Essentials 2010.

Tragedy on the 17th St. Bicycle Expressway (or Losing My Life on the Way to School)

2010-05-14T09:38:00.003-05:00

Today started out pretty normal for me. Katie was going to bike home after work so I drove her and her bike there this morning before returning home and preparing for my bike commute into school. The morning was a bit cooler (~55'F) with little wind which made for a nice ride. I pulled up to the school gym to park my bike and head into the shower when my stomach sank. It was the same feeling I had when, in the same spot, my bike was stolen several months ago.

My bag, which was attached to the rear rack on my bike when I left home, was no longer there.

This bag had a good chunk of my life in it. My hard drive with both my Master's thesis and research computer files in it. My lab notebook and 3-ring binder with relevant journal articles in it. My wallet and house keys.

I hopped back on my bike and began to retrace my path, my mind racing. The bag was on the left-hand side of the rack meaning when it fell off it would have fallen off into the traffic (rather than the sidewalk) side of the road. This means it would get the way of cars traveling on the road. It also means it would be obvious and out in the open for any passerby to snatch up and claim for his or her own. This was another sinking revelation.

The movie Signs has a fantastic and telling bit that I call "the two kinds of people" scene. Merrill (Joaquin Phoenix) and Graham (Mel Gibson) are sitting on the couch after the kids have fallen asleep watching the news coverage of the incredible events of the day. Graham, a reverend who had left the faith after the death of his wife is explaining to Merrill that there are two kinds of people and they respond differently to big events in life. One group (and I'm paraphrasing from memory) sees fantastic events and "it may be good, it may be bad but they know deep down that they are going to be all right"; they believe in a higher power that is working in their best interest. The other group knows "that whatever happens, they are on their own." There is no higher power, no God and when tragedy strikes it is up the individuals to define their future.

I don't write about it much on this blog but I am squarely in the first group, a spiritual man. When my personal tragedy struck today, I was quickly calling on God for help and mercy. The situation was entirely out of my control and it was going to take divine intervention to get the life I had in that bag back. I was pedaling and praying, both frantically, as I headed back towards home, eyes on the other side of the road, looking for that small treasure. It would take so little for things to turn out poorly. The bag could be run over and the contents destroyed or somebody could have picked it up. It would take a miracle for somebody to stop, pick up the bag out of the road, and set it aside for me to find. A small but definite miracle.

As I flew back home I began to think more about this. If I really believed in God and believed He was for me and not against me, then I had to accept the possibility that I might not get my bag back and that this would be a good thing for me. I'm reading a fantastic book right now, "How People Grow", that makes this point. Often it takes tragedy for us to grow and mature as people because we tend to slack off when life is easy and pain free. Painful events in life can work out for our best but only if we respond well to them. Cruising down the streets of Wichita I didn't want to accept that this could actually be the case. I didn't want this pain and hassle, I had things to do today. Please, please, just left me have my bag back. I was praying for mercy, for the easy way out of this. I was entirely dependent on God and I wanted Him to give me a break.

He did.

A small miracle occurred. Though it took me most of my ride home, I found my bag. Somebody had taken it and leaned it against the fence by the sidewalk. As best I can tell, it wasn't riffled through or explored, just tucked away out of harms way, waiting to be claimed.

I was thanking God the whole way back to school.

On the trail today

2010-05-05T16:01:00.002-05:00

A few highlights from my bike ride to and from school today:

A squirrel that had managed to abscond an entire doughnut from who knows where. He couldn't seem to decide whether to run and keep the doughnut safe or stop and eat it. He was doing some of both.
A dozen or so Wichita Police bike-mounted officers. They were all congregated in a small neighborhood street. I had no idea we had so many bike-mounted officers and I have no idea why they were all hanging out together. I waved as I rode by; they waved back.
A sign calling for volunteers to come out and protest Sarah Palin while she was in town for a fundraiser this past weekend. I think the newspaper said there were a few dozen protesters so I don't think that the sign was very effective. This is confirmed by that fact that I only noticed it a few days after the event.
A long line of SUVs and trucks picking up students from the Catholic school in our neighborhood. There must have been forty or fifty of them, each picking up a child or two from the school.

Power Meter

2010-05-04T17:33:00.002-05:00

(A warning to all my non-engineering friends: this is a highly nerdy post.)

A few years ago I received as a gift a wonderfully nerdy item for any electrical engineer: the Kill-A-Watt. The device is used to measure electrical power consumption in household items and I've been using it to do just that, mainly to see how much power devices draw when they are plugged in but turned off.

One of the measurements this device makes is something called the power factor. The power factor is a measure of the ratio of real power a device consumes to the amount of power the device appears to draw from the grid (the apparent power). Devices with a low power factor are bad because they demand more power from the grid than they actually use, sending the excess back every half cycle. Some of this power that gets sent back gets burned up in losses on the wires and is in essence, wasted.

Traditionally, power factor has been caused by electric motors due to their high inductance and the fix was relatively straight-forward: adding a capacitor near the motor provides a place to temporarily store the energy that would have been sent back to the grid. When the motor then appears to demand it again, it gets pulled out of the capacitor. In fact, in these cases, the power factor can be calculated by a tiny bit of math measuring the difference between when the peak current flows and when the peak voltage is present. The larger the difference in time between these two events, the lower the power factor.

Over the past few decades, though, there has been another big power factor culprit on the rise: rectifiers. These are the circuits that change AC into DC and are in nearly every electronic goody around the house: computers, TVs, DVD players, laptops: if you buy it at an electronics shop it has a rectifier. The power factor problems these devices create is very different from motors, though. They send the power back to the grid in a very different way; they convert some of the power at the traditional 60Hz frequency to power at higher frequencies, distorting the waveform. The fix that works for motors does nothing in this case and measuring the power factor is much more complicated.

Well, in a lab I was finishing for class, we had a very fancy (and expensive) power meter we were using that measured the power factor in two ways, the motor way (displacement power factor) and the rectifier way (true power factor, the more useful and accurate of the two). Since I had access to this, I brought in my Kill-A-Watt and we set up both meters to measure the power factor on a PC (which contains a rectifier). Much to my surprise, the fancy power meter showed that my Kill-A-Watt measured the more complicated true power factor. I was very impressed that such a simple and inexpensive device was able to measure this accurately.

This made me a happy nerd for the day.

Thunderstorm

2010-04-24T16:35:00.002-05:00

Our helpful weather radio just went off and alerted us to a severe thunderstorm warning for our county. This is the first warning of the thunderstorm season which has thus far been pretty slow. It is not, though, the first significant thunderstorm this year; I guess the others didn't have high enough winds to be classified as "severe".

The weather radio is a curse and a blessing. We are thankful that it is loud enough to wake us (if necessary) when life-threatening weather is passing through the area. We curse it, though, when it wakes us in the middle of the night for these severe thunderstorm warnings. If we are in bed and asleep, we don't want to be waken just to find out that we have already taken the precautions necessary for a thunderstorm, namely, to be inside. There have been a few nights when we felt like parents of new-borns, being waken every few hours to a whining radio.

What can you do, though? All of this disturbance is worth the hassle when tornados do come around and we'd much rather over-alerted than under.

Happy Tax Day

2010-04-14T06:49:00.002-05:00

Hopefully all you US residents have your taxes done and mailed in. I happen to live in Kansas right now and the state has figured out that they can save money if they allow people to fill out electronic forms online. To encourage people to do so, they make filing through their website free. Once your federal returns are done, completing the forms online is fast, maybe twenty minutes. All the forms are completed and submitted electronically and any refund you may get is direct deposited in a week or so. I'm a big believer in this idea and am glad to see the federal government is slowly coming around to the idea and realizing manually processing paper returns is expensive and error-prone compared to electronic forms.

This is all beside the point, though. The uplifting topic for today is national fiscal responsibility, the national debt, and what we are going to do about it. First, some data:

I don't put this data up to simply give people something to worry about. I truly believe this is a very serious problem that has been effectively ignored for several decades. We are on an unsustainable course that needs to be corrected. Sadly (but fairly) I think that the solution will involve increasing taxes (sorry Tea Party) and decreasing spending (sorry social welfare and defense people). In other words, we've dug ourselves into this hole and the path out is going to be painful.

To help keep me honest and the conversations on-track as I bring this up with friends, I'm starting to think of the solutions to this problem in terms of the sacrifices that I need to be willing to make. Rather than looking at the problem as a whole (which needs to be done), I'm trying to think of it very personally. What government benefits do I need to give up to get our country back on track financially? How much more taxes will I need to be willing to pay to make this happen? What tax credits and deductions that I enjoy now should I surrender so that our country can be fiscally responsible? Being an academic, which research and development programs that I care about should lose their federal funding?

For each of us, the answers to these kinds of questions are different. There are some that are going to have to give up federal subsidies (Medicare, welfare, etc). Others will be paying a lot more in taxes. There will probably be federal employees who will lose their jobs in the government's attempt to control spending. Its not going to be pretty or fun.

It needs to be done, though. It may not seem like it to some, but these past few decades have been ones where we as a society have ignored the financial costs of the federal fiscal lifestyle (if you will) we have been enjoying. The time is coming when we will have to face these costs and the sooner the better. The first step is always admitting you have a problem.

I encourage you to write your federal Representatives and Senators. They will only be motivated to action if we make it clear that this is important to us. Vote accordingly. The attitude of the federal government is a reflection of the attitude of us, the people. We can't expect them to act responsibly until we take responsibility for our own actions and choices. Until we are upset enough with the situation to actually do something about it, we can't expect them to do any better. Doing something can start with a simple letter or email.

If you are a person of faith as I am, pray for our nation. I have been convicted lately of just how desperate a situation we are in (beyond but including our finances) and have begun to ask God to work in the hearts and minds of others and help save us from our own self-destructive desires. For the USA, a nation that has enjoyed tremendous financial wealth, to be willing to accept a lower standard of living for the sake of our country as a whole will take a miracle.

Fish, Fish Everywhere

2010-03-30T17:12:00.002-05:00

An acquaintance of mine recently postulated a theory to me: Taco Bell's recent introduction of the Shrimp Taco (which he declared disgusting; I'll take his word for it) was a move to allow more observant Catholics something to eat from their menu during Lent. I was skeptical but didn't know any better one way or the other so I said nothing.

I noticed yesterday that McDonalds has brought back its fish sandwich.

Today, a BBQ place I drove by was advertising its salmon BBQ.

Maybe he was onto something.

OK Go III

2010-03-26T08:28:00.002-05:00

I found out about OK Go's third video from a podcast I listen to which I would safely describe as not being on the pulse of pop culture (much like myself); the odds are good you've already seen this somewhere else. For the rest of you like me, enjoy this greatness:

For a lab in college I was on a team that had to make a Rube Goldberg machine, one with only a dozen or so mechanisms. The demonstration of these contraptions is a school event and I had been watching them for two years before I got a crack at my own as a junior. I was highly committed to making sure that ours worked perfectly and insisted that it run without error ten times in a row the night before the demonstration. It did by midnight and we were confident it would work fine the next day.

It didn't. Two new failures popped up that we had never seen before and we joined the almost universal ranks of those who weren't able to demonstrate a working machine in that classes history.

I bring this up because, even though it took 85 filmed takes to get it right (according to their website), a Rube Goldberg this size that works at all is a miracle.

Kansas City in Spring

2010-03-20T09:00:00.002-05:00

My wife and I are up in Kansas City for a early mini-anniversary weekend. Here's a little trip update.

The weather was wonderful yesterday, mid-60s. Today we woke up to snow. And they're expecting more throughout today. Its the first day of spring, too.
We were able to get our hotel room for half-price via Priceline. The thrifty man in me is very happy.
We went to the Federal Reserve Bank here in Kansas City and visited the museum there; definitely worth the visit. The best part was a viewing area into the money sorting/counting area. We couldn't see the whole area but it looked like it consisted of a long hallway with sorting rooms on each side the whole way down. The rooms were all glass and there seemed to be about five security cameras for every worker and there weren't a lot of workers. There were also three robots that took the cases of money from the sorting into the vault. These guys were highly automated with complete freedom of movement and the ability to wirelessly open the doors to the sorting rooms to pick-up the cases of money and, similarly, the gates to the vault to drop them off. The rest of the museum is mediocre unless you're into coin collecting but the engineer in me loved the robots. They were fascinating. Oh, and we got a free bag of shredded money.
This morning at breakfast it was clear that there was a group of guys here at the hotel that were fanatical about some kind of Dungeons-and-Dragons-like game. Every few minutes it seemed like another one would wander in carrying an elaborate game case and/or folder. They congregated in the corner and as their numbers grew we heard more and more talk of "upgraded warlocks" and "damage rolls". As an occasional board game player (but never anything like this) I've never thought of trying to hold my own mini-gaming convention.

Up on the schedule today is probably some more shopping, an art museum, and visiting with some friends.

Day-Night Map

2010-03-10T21:40:00.002-06:00

This is what nerds like me do when they need to take a break from reading and homework. I've been wanting to put together this animation for a while but didn't know how to get the images I needed. Until today, that is. Thanks to timeanddate.com, I was able to "create" the images and then stitch them together into a movie.

The animation below shows where the sun is and is not shining on the Earth at noon Greenwich time over the course of one calendar year. The yellow dot in the middle is the sun and the white dot that quickly passes by is the moon. And, just to be clear, the light areas are where the sun is shining at that time of day and the dark areas are where it is not.

My wife and I spent several minutes watching the animation in a loop, mesmerized by it. I hope you enjoy it as well.

Teams

2010-03-03T06:45:00.002-06:00

I remember back in my undergrad days at LeTourneau frequently hearing from the head of the engineering department how employers today were looking for people who could work on teams and that teamwork was a norm in the workplace. He would cite the engineering advisory board that the school had assembled as his source. The advisory board was a collection of people who, for various reasons, were supposed to have their hand on the pulse of the engineering workforce. Their role was to advise the faculty in such a way as to keep the engineering program at LeTourneau relevant.

While in school, working in a team was rarely a good thing as far as I was concerned because I always felt like the act of coordinating, organizing, delegating, and the like was overhead effort; I often felt like it would be easier to just do everything myself. (This kind of gets at the "mythical man month" idea where some business managers assume that effort from any employee is interchangeable with effort from any other employee and to get something done faster you can simply add more people. In reality, adding more people introduces more overhead and coordination costs that may not pay-off in the long run.) I always wondered just where these advisory board members worked and what kind of teams they worked on. If there teams were anything like ours at school, it was a miracle that anything useful got done.

As I've pondered this over the years and worked for two very different manufacturers in industry , I've come to the conclusion that I think there was a hidden communication breakdown between the advisory board and the LeTourneau faculty. I think the root of the breakdown comes in the multiple definitions or styles of teams. Here's how I see things, making up the terms and definitions as I go along.

Independent teams: These are teams where very little interaction is required between team members and the final result of their effort is the sum of their cummulative effort. There is no synergy, no interaction effects, just a bunch of solo efforts combined. Using sports analogies, these are the wrestling, track and gymnastic teams. Everybody does their own thing and the output of the team is sum of each individual players efforts. Some might say that this is hardly a team at all and there is clearly a good case to be made for this point. Regardless, the word "team" is used in these situations and not just in the athletic world. They are some form of team.

Co-operative teams: Co-operative teams have significant independent responsibilities as well as a role in a larger whole; an example would be a basketball team. The fitness and skill of each player is required and there is definitely a huge positive effect of having superstar members but no superstar could single-handedly win on his or her own. The team must coordinate their efforts, plan and work together to achieve their goal, and often must execute in a manner that is both aware and dependent on others. There is still high value in the skills of the invidiuals though. Basketball teams need their specialists, their three point shooters or the big guy down low to get the rebounds and everybody on the team needs to be making their free throws. There are always superstars that seem to be able to do it all but even they can't win the whole game on their own. They excel but not without other (admittedly less skilled) players doing their part. Michael Jordan would win hardly any games if he was the only players on the team and wouldn't do much better if the rest of his team were high school players.

Integrated Teams: These are the teams where the value of the team is almost entirely a function of how well the team works as a unified whole. In the world of sports this is the syncronized swimming, or bobsled team. There is very little if any room for a superstar to excel and the team is at its best when in complete uniformity, when no part stands out. There is obviously a minimum level of fitness required to be on the team but the hard work is in the coordination, getting everybody to move together and to act as one. We on the outside look at the team as a whole and evaluate them in terms of the collective output. There is very little value in one swimmer (or at least the output isn't very impressive); the value of the team exists only as the collection of parts. To use a business term, it is only synergy and any part on its own has very little if any value. In the business world, these are committees where consensus is required for any decision to be made.

Clearly, these three catagories are arbitrary and the reality is that the groups above are points on a specturm. Every team falls on this spectrum somewhere. There is probably some value of thinking of the teams in your life and where they fall in this spectrum but the whole reason I bring this up is to point out there can be very wide definitions and understandings of what a team should be.

The engineering teams in industry I've been on are much closer to a track team than a synchronized swimming team. If the track team is a ten and the synchronized swimming team is a zero then I'd say the engineering teams I have experience with fall somewhere between an eight and a nine. The teams I worked on at school were more like a four. Part of the reason school projects end up being more integrated is that there is often a lack of clear leadership; this forces the team members into a consensus mindset. With a good clear leader in place, the team members can spend less time coordinating with everybody else and more time accomplishing their part of the project. Of course, in engineering classes, most people would prefer to do the engineering rather than the managing, thus the trouble. Maybe a specific team-work class would solve that problem.

Parked in front of the engineering building

2010-02-23T16:34:00.001-06:00

Yes, the key does turn when the car is in motion; I saw it the other day.

Undercover Boss

2010-02-22T07:46:00.002-06:00

CBS is a running a new reality show called "Undercover Boss" where the CEO of a large company secretly takes on the role of an entry-level worker in his/her organization to get a better idea of what life at the other end of the food-chain is like. It provides an opportunity to honestly see without any problem-masking intermediation that bureaucracies often provide how the company is running from the ground up. This is a great idea in general and makes for some pretty entertaining viewing.

Before saying another word I have to make the standard reality TV disclaimer. We see roughly 45 minutes of a weeks worth of experience over the course of a single episode of this show. I have no idea how the companies/CEOs that are profiled are chosen and have no idea how the specific locations they work at are chosen. The goal of the show's producers is to make something entertaining to watch and that means editing out almost everything and just saving "the good parts". Those creating the show need to make a story out of the events, regardless of what actually happens. Even though there is no script, the portrayal of each person we see is not entirely up to him or her. We only get to see the parts the producers want us to see.

The last segment of the show features the CEO talking to those he worked with (now out of his disguise and back in his normal job of CEO) and his top-level executives about what he saw while working entry-level positions and what changes he'd like to make. This is the part of the show that is both the most feel-good and the most frustrating to me. I enjoy watching it because the CEO gets a chance to make things right and help out those who are sometimes struggling to get by in his corporation. For the store clerk who needs a new kidney he puts a program in place to get more of the people in his organization registered as organ donors. For the line worker with art skills he offered a position helping create some of visuals for marketing campaigns.

I'm a systematizer, though, and these solutions seem to be one-off fixes for specific people rather than trying to re-structure and re-design the organization so that other people in these kinds of situations can also receive a similar benefit. It is easy to do very dramatic and even expensive/generous acts towards the five or six people the CEO worked with that week. He could double the salary of each, give them fantastic medical coverage and an extra week of vacation and it would have no significant financial impact on the company, dramatically improve their lives, and make for great feel-good TV. This is, generally speaking, what I feel like the CEOs are choosing to do.

The harder work would involve analyzing the systems of the organization as a whole to try to determine who this undesirable situation arose. Does the line worker with art skills not show other people is work? Is there a path for a hard worker like him to move to a position that can use these skills? How can somebody with such talent who is already in the organization find a a job that is a better fit? For the lady that needs a kidney transplant, does she have good medical coverage now? Are there things the company could have done to help prevent her from being in a situation where she needs the transplant? Are there things that need to be done in the work schedule to make people in her situation more easily able to take time off to get the medical treatment she needs? These are hard questions to answer and the solutions can be much more expensive and difficult to implement. Systemic change is no cake-walk.

The CEOs say that their time at the bottom will change and impact how they run the company and I truly hope it does. If the man at the top has lost touch with all the ins-and-outs of the business and forgets the people behind the numbers, he needs to do something to get his perspective re-adjusted. I fear, though, that once band-aids have been applied to the five or six employees he worked with for that week that the motive for change will slowly evaporate and that no long-term, company-wide change will take effect. It will be a wasted opportunity.

I hope I'm wrong.

Curling

2010-02-18T21:22:00.002-06:00

What does it mean that for the past two days I have scheduled my work-out time so that I can be around a TV with cable so that I can watch curling?

If you don't know the game, you should. I know its not very possible and lack glamor but it is a very interesting game. A little bit of billiards, a fair amount of strategy, and of course the skill to place those big heavy rocks in precise places on a sheet of ice. Plus lots of yelling. You should check it out if you haven't ever seen a game. Read the rules, sit back and be fascinated.

(The best part are the sweepers, in my opinion.)

EZCracker

2010-02-17T10:15:00.002-06:00

While watching the Olympics the other day I saw the best "as seen on TV" kind of ad for an off-the-wall product: the EZCracker. Its a small mechanism that cracks eggs for you. Go ahead, click the link and watch the ad on the website so that you can understand power and utility of such a device.

Before I skewer this ad, I must say it clearly has a use. If you lack motor control for whatever reason, find getting some egg on your hand is unbearable, or like having kitchen gadgets, then this product is for you. In fact, the egg-separator is particularly ingenious and though I don't need to separate eggs often, this would be much faster than doing it by hand.

But seriously. Do we all struggle with cracking eggs so much that a device like this is needed? Like I said there are probably people out there who could use such a product, like maybe older people who have lost the fine motor control they once had. These are not the people in the ad, though, and thus are presumably not the target audience for this device. No, the people in the add are the most aggressive egg crackers I have ever seen. Eggs are known to be fragile and yet when trying to break them open they seem to be using a rather large degree of force.

And how about the consequences of eating a baked good with a bit of egg-shell in at as portrayed in the ad? You would think this gal hand stumbled across some raw chicken liver or perhaps a small fish head in her muffin by the look of disgust on her face. When cleaning up eggs that you were trying to get in the pan but somehow entirely missed, it looks like the gal is just kind of swishing them around on the stove-top rather than actually wiping them up. Who are these people?

The king of un-usefulness, though, goes to the "but wait, there's more" product: the EZScrambler. No more mixing eggs in a bowl, you can now do it right in the eggshell. Again, do we really need a device like this in our lives? Is is so hard to clean a bowl and mixing utensil that we'd rather buy a gadget?

This is why I hate marketing. Though there is clearly a market for this device, it is much smaller than the ad is trying to reach. This is the heart of marketing; creating a demand for a product that most people probably don't need. Its phony and manipulative and I wish it weren't so apparently effective; if it weren't we wouldn't have ads for the EZCracker on TV.

Office at school

2010-02-12T13:06:00.004-06:00

I've moved up in the world of academia. The normal and somewhat demeaning status of cubical dweller in the business world is something of a prized token for students in academia and I have been awarded such a prize. I have a desk! At school! As part of my job for the university (analyzing some data on a research project) I have been given a computer and a desk that I will also be using for my Master's thesis work. My advisor has about a dozen desks just outside the lab where I will be working and one of them is mine, at least for now. Having a place to park my motorcycle gear and retreat to during the day is fantastic and it will make it easier to stay on campus for longer periods of time during the day. And the office has everything: a microwave, coffee maker, chairs, hot chocolate; everything!

The only thing that is perplexing is this sign I found posted on one of the cubical walls near my desk. I don't know what any Myers-Briggs ENFPs would be doing in an engineering lab. I hope its a joke because I can't stand those ENFPs. They totally through me out of my zone. INTJ is where the engineering power is at.

Livescribe Pulse Smartpen

2010-02-04T14:54:00.003-06:00

This is it, the device that smoothly bridges that classic analog/digital divide in the college classroom: paper notes. The Livescribe Pulse Smartpen, when using special paper, records not only what is written down but, if you so desire, the audio in your environment when you do the writing. The pen does more than capture your notes and more than record the classroom lecture; it does both in a synergistic way. After class, if you want to hear the lecture related a graph you drew, just tap the page with the pen and the audio starts playing back, just like that. Even better, to clarify your written notes you can add to them while the audio is playing back and that writing will be captured as well and associated with the audio at that point. You can also upload the audio and captured writing to your PC and review everything there.

The feature list and uses for this pen could go on and this last Christmas I got one. I've been using it in class for a few weeks now and it works exactly as advertised. Its been easy to go back through lectures, listening, reading my notes and adding to them. Having the digital copy of my course-work is great and the product works as advertised.

Except when it doesn't.

My first pen had a problem. It would only hold a charge for about twenty minutes (though new), far less than even a single lecture. I called Livescribe and they said this was a known issue on a number of pens and sent me a new one, free of charge; I didn't even pay for shipping the new one in or the old one back. Though it didn't make it in time for the start of school I was very impressed at how responsive they were.

The first chance I could I put the new pen in action, recording my first full lecture (audio and notes) and then a conversation with my professor afterward regarding my thesis. When I got home I re-listened to the lecture, augmenting my notes as I went along. Except there was this loud whine through both recordings that at times made the audio almost unusable. I didn't remember anything in the classroom that was making that much noise and decided to test things out at home and in the empty classroom before everybody showed up. No noise at home, plenty of whine in the empty room. Great. The only place I really need my pen to work and its picking up the electronic Martian landing beacon or something and now I can't hear the professor over the din.

I called Livescribe and they suggested a few tweaks in the settings to see if that would help. I tried those today with no success. Another call this afternoon and after much over-the-phone shrugging they offered to send another pen out. Reluctantly I agreed. The tech support on the phone was very helpful and said that in the three years she's been working there she's only heard of a few cases of this happening. She thinks its something in the classroom making the electrical noise and not a problem with the pen, per se.

This is a product I wanted to believe in and have been hesitant to endorse or promote since I haven't had much time with it. I'm still hanging in the balance at this point but know two things. One, there is clearly still a need for some engineering work to be done. Two, their customer support has been great so far with low wait times on the phone and the ability and willingness to make things right as much as they can.

Here's hoping pen number three is the trick.

Free Time

2010-02-01T09:16:00.002-06:00

Despite the title for this post, I don't necessarily have that much free time in my life right now. My general commitments for this semester include nine hours at Wichita State (one traditional class plus my thesis) and working half time for the university. Well, the work stuff hasn't started up yet and my thesis has been stalled out this past week while I wait on some equipment to get installed for me. In addition to this school stuff, though, I have other tasks around the house that didn't get done over Christmas due to being out of town a lot. There's also church-related stuff and other longer-term projects. I don't lack things that need to get done.

More accurately, then, the title should be "Unstructured Time". Every morning (or the evening before) I have to sit down and think through what I'm going to do, what the next day looks like for me. Even on the days when have class I have to decide if I'm going to stay on campus, for how long, if I need to bring a lunch, what I would do with that time, etc. I have to create my own structure and, in essence, my own priorities; build my own day. This is not a bad thing at all, I would even argue that it is a luxury to be able to have such control over one's life. I'm not being dictated to, I'm looking at the next twelve hours of my life and deciding what is important, what needs to be get done and what can wait.

It reminds we a lot of how I felt after graduating college and starting on my first job. Sure, I had work every day but after that I was totally free, no homework (and no family at that point). I could do whatever I wanted and had complete freedom of how I spent those hours. Life stretched before me and there was a wide, seemingly endless gamut of choices. I could be more involved in church, I could take up new hobbies or get back to ones I had dropped in college, I could read, I could watch TV or go to the movies, I could go to the park or the art museum, I could join a club or a band,....

Its a unique place to be in and it doesn't happen very often in life. Such broad latitude is a gift; we should all pray that if or when it comes along next, we don't squander it. That's what I'm trying to do, put it to good use while I can.

The Oath

2010-01-26T17:47:00.002-06:00

The new semester is off and rolling and this time around, I have a job on campus! One of my professors hired me to help with some research, mainly doing some statistical analysis on some data that another university is collecting related to something in the power system. I don't know much about it right now as things are just getting started. Stay tuned.

As part of getting this (paying) job I had to fill out paperwork to get hired on as a student at Wichita State. This was a mostly harmless but very repetitious process as I wrote down the same information on multiple applications: federal documents, state documents, university documents, background check authorization, etc. I'm sure I went through the name/address/birthday routine at least six times. It is in moments like this that the engineer in me kicks in and wishes for some kind of centralized database where all of this can be stored and easily accessed. It is then that the libertarian in me kicks in and points out what a dangerous idea this is. Oh well.

The most unusual part of the application was a simple one-paragraph section of the state paperwork which I will reproduce here in full:

STATE OF KANSAS EMPLOYEE’S OATH

K.S.A. 75-4308 et seq requires that the following oath from K.S.A. 54-106, be signed by new employees before entering the duties of employment and before funds for services may be disbursed:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the constitution of the United States and the constitution of the State of Kansas, and faithfully discharge the duties of my office or employment. So help me God.

___________________________________ Employee’s Signature

Not making this up at all. Coming across this stopped me in a bemused pause. I guess I was effectively going to be a state employee so I guess that means I have to take an oath of office. Sadly, I don't have a working knowledge of either the US Constitution or the Constitution of the State of Kansas and I hope that whatever knowledge I do have combined with my ability to "discharge the duties of my office or employment" will be good enough.

Hollywood and the Feel-Good Story

2009-12-31T07:21:00.002-06:00

Katie and I went to go see "The Blind Side" yesterday afternoon and both of us enjoyed the movie. It was a well-crafted, feel-good, inspirational story that was at least loosely based in reality. For those of you who haven't seen it, the plot focusses on an older teenager, lost in the foster care system, who is taken in by a family and through a lot of effort, is able to succeed in school and football in a way he never was before. The plot is not horribly creative (hard to do in a feel-good movie) but still entertaining nonetheless and, using the Creshell Pennington criteria, "its a good movie because it makes your cry."

I have no problem with stories like this making it to the big screen. Like many movies, there is some degree of "escaping from reality" that many people desire to see and following a story full of winners makes everybody happy when they leave the theater. There is a place in the spectrum of films for stories like this; dozens more have been made and will be made where the down and out are helped to success by caring outsiders. School teachers tend to be featured in such films.

All that said, I do have a nit to pick with this movie because it implies that the problem that many of the "under-privileged" have is a lack of opportunity, that nobody seems to care enough to give them a shot. These films tend to portray a situation where the key to changing lives is that loving mentors give these children the opportunity to succeed and they will. In this film, the family that takes on the down-and-out youth does invest quite a bit; they provide him a home, clothes, food, a tutor, and genuinely make him a part of the family. Based on my relatively limited experience with working with at-risk kids, I'd have to say that the story ordinarily isn't as simple as that. Often, even when given opportunities, kids in the these situations do not respond well and often end up making choices that are self-defeating. More simply put, coming from a broken home can't be fixed by a change in circumstances, at least for most people.

Most kids who have difficult home lives have more than problems than the externalities of these situations; its more than not having, say, a reliable source of food, money for school supplies, a quiet place to do homework, parents to offer support and encouragement, etc. These are all real barriers and some of them can be overcome simply; the federal school lunch program is an example of such an attempt. More fundamentally, though, these students have a problem with developing good decision-making skills and behavior patterns that will allow them to grow into healthy, mature adults. You might call this "having character", in a non-moral sense of the word.

The cause for this lack of character development is usually straight-forward: the naturally influential adult figures in their lives (mostly parents) often have not been good role models and have failed to instill these good habits to their children, usually because they don't have the habits themselves. The damage done to these students has been deeper than a school-lunch program or after-school tutoring can fix. It requires digging in and making a significant investment of time and energy. It requires a great inconvenience on the part of those seeking to help and, in my experience, will be more frustrating than rewarding for a very long time.

The church I attend is partnered with an organization called Youth Horizons that seeks to provide mentors/role-models for kids who are in these kinds of difficult situations. I have many friends who are mentors and know a few of the stuff there decently well. For all of them, it is a labor of love. There is no high-altitude "love-bombing", this is "in the trenches" kind of work that isn't done in a casual way. The only reason they stick with it is that it can sincerely believe that this kind of work can actually change lives and have meaningful impact down the road.

I had a friend from my time in Boise that, in his thirties, finally was reaping the benefits of investment that others made in his teenage years. Fifteen years after his time in a church youth group where he had many loving adults pouring into his life, he realized that his life back then was better than it was now and that he needed help like that to get his life in order now. He moved back Boise, where his old youth pastor was working, still in ministry, and asked for help.

I ended up connected with him and saw a humble man who had realized that many of his choices in life had not played out the way he hoped and that he needed a fresh start under the influence of people who cared about him. There were some externalities that needed fixing: he needed a cheap place to stay, he needed a job, he needed help getting his finances in order. More importantly, though, he realized that he needed a new character. He needed to learn how to make good decisions for himself, he needed to learn how to make short-term sacrifices for long-term gain, he needed to learn how to follow-through on commitments he made. He was extremely teachable and a joy to walk along side as he tried to re-build his life and it was all because of the investment made when he was a young adult.

Clearly, children who don't develop character in their youth grow up into adults that also lack this kind of character. Being ten or twenty years older than a teenager does not guarantee character; an individual has to choose to learn and grow from experiences in life to gain that character. Without that character, they lack the ability to raise their kids in a more successful way than they know. You can't instill a value in your children that you yourself don't have. When people talk about the problems coming from broken families, in my mind, this is the fundamental issue, this cycle where a lack of character continues to perpetuate itself from one generation to the next. We all "inherit" the failings of our parents; they are the most influential models we have and whether we like it or not, we bear their fingerprints on our lives.

I hope that movies like "The Blind Side" inspire people to be more involved in their communities, helping students who have rough backgrounds to grow into men and women of character. Steel yourself, though, because it probably won't be as easy as what you see in the movies. Count the cost and make the investment.

Merry Academic Christmas

2009-12-25T09:42:00.003-06:00

Well, its been a week since my third semester at Wichita State ended; just one more to go until I'm done with my Master's. I took all my tests two weeks ago (the week before finals) and had a final presentation the last day of finals week. Unlike last semester, our presentation went nearly exactly as planned and the presentations by my classmates were also much better than in previous semesters.

My final semester will be different than the past three. I'm only taking one class and the other six hours will be thesis. I've already unofficially started on it this past fall and have made a good start, getting a lot of the time-eating logistics and co-ordination with other people worked through. Now I just have to, you know, do my part. Developing some software, doing some experiments, lots of writing, that kind of thing.

In addition to my official school-work this spring semester I also got a job with my thesis advisor as a research assistant. We haven't nailed down what specific project I'll be working on but it'll be 20 hours a week and it looks like it will continue into the summer as well. This is essentially the work/school balance I had when employed at Cessna, just without the commute time. I'm excited about getting a chance to see what the research world is like and hopefully get some ideas for further research I could be involved with.

So, yeah, after talking with my wife we've decided I should go on to do my PhD and unless something crazy happens it will be at Wichita State. I've done a lot of reading over the Christmas break from other graduate students who have written about their experiences on the Web and it is echoing what I hear from grad students I know personally: having a good advisor is gold and I have a fantastic advisor. I know the department well, am interested in what my advisor is working on and have enjoyed my classes so far.

One of the best articles I've read recently had some very good advice: write down and define very specifically what you will and won't do for a PhD. Katie read the article too and she is a big fan of this idea, defining a line that will set expectations for the next several years of school. I'll have to think through this before I put pen to paper but the exercise will be invaluable. Part of the appeal of Wichita State is that, given our state in life and circumstances, it is a program that I can manage. If I was ten years younger, without family, and able to move anywhere in the world, the situation might be different. That's not where I am now, though, and so single-minded devotion to a PhD is not an option; I know that I'm not willing to give all my life now for the degree.

There are many great things about this Christmas but having a path for the next few years nailed down (Lord willing) is the best Christmas gift.

Two Wheels Through Winter

2009-12-07T16:57:00.002-06:00

I rode my motorcycle to class today. The high for today in Wichita was 24 'F and I've ridden both my bicycle and motorcycle in colder weather. When I lived in Boise, I would routinely ride by bicycle all the way through the winter. Boise is pretty dry so I rarely had to worry about snow and ice and since I was moving the whole time, only my fingers and toes would get cold. I would often end up riding with my jacket unzipped due to all the heat I was generating.

Now that I don't have a commuter-worth bicycle, I'm on my motorcycle all the time. Many people think that riding in the winter is crazy, it being so cold outside. It helps that my commute is only five miles or so and I don't ride with snow or ice on the ground. When the temperature doesn't rise above freezing, I would be hard-pressed to say I enjoy the ride or find it comfortable. Its over soon enough, though, and I can manage.

I was reminded a week or two ago why I do ride motorcycles when we spent over $1000 on car repairs: its cheap. $5 for fuel every two weeks, insurance is $100 a year, I can do most of the repairs myself and though parts aren't "cheap" they tend to be cheaper than a comparable part for cars. After paying $350 dollars to have the power window mechanism replaced, I get almost giddy when I think that this is a repair I'll never have to make on the motorcycle. No air-conditioning, no heater, one cylinder, four valves (which I just adjusted last weekend), one carburetor, two wheels. There's something to be said for simplicity.

Electric Cars

2009-12-01T16:53:00.002-06:00

I just got back from a presentation by one of my class-mates who was giving his PhD dissertation proposal. His topic was the performance of the future "smart grid" and one of the major factors was the impact that electric cars will have. He said, and I'm assuming he did the research and isn't making this up (a bad thing to do if you're trying to get your PhD), that the Chevy Volt is estimated to use in two months of operation the same amount of energy an average household would in one year.

Think about that. It may be cheaper per mile to operate an electric vehicle but that may only be true if you're the only one that has one. Utilities will have to build more power plants, the distribution grid will all have to be massively upgraded for all the additional energy it will have to provide, rates may go up. Buying a Chevy Volt and parking it in your garage will, to the power company, look like you just built six more homes to live in and are powering them all from the same wires that are running to your house right now.

This seems like big deal to me. I'm glad people like my friend are doing the research on how to make this work now before it becomes a huge issue.

Admitted

2009-11-10T12:13:00.002-06:00

I just got a letter from WSU stating that I have been admitted to their PhD program for the fall 2010. This is not really a surprise considering that they admitted me to their Master's program and I've done quite well in it. Its still good to see it in black and white, though.

So if I decide to go the PhD route in the fall, I've got at least one place to call home. I plan on applying to at least one other school and am debating/agonizing about whether I want to go through all the effort of applying to one of the Big Name schools. I would probably have to retake the GRE test because my score is very mediocre (when compared with those who are admitted to such institutions). More effort, more studying, more tests....

This PhD decision is not easy for me. Though Wichita State is far from prestigious I have found a great professor here who would serve as my advisor and he is well-respected in the field. The quality of the eduction here is pretty good, though not as rigorous as I was hoping. (On the other hand, I don't know if my life supports a rigorous program at this point.)

The big problem with Wichita State is the name recognition. If I get a PhD from Wichita State, nobody is ever going to look at my resume and think big things of me. In general, I don't care much about this but there are a very small group of people I do need to be impressed with me: those that might want to hire me. In this single regard, Wichita State fails me. In fact, this is my only serious reservation about working on a PhD here; will I be able to have a career in academia after getting done?

I guess we'll just have to wait and see.

New bathroom floor

2009-10-23T20:29:00.005-05:00

The last home improvement project for the season (if you consider October part of the spring/summer season) was replacing the floor in the front bathroom with, you guessed it, tile. In the process, I managed to break the old toilet and thus turn a $200 project into a $450 project. As you might guess, breaking the toilet was not a high point of the project for me.

Just like tiling the kitchen and dining room, under the carpet I found vinyl on particle-board subfloor. All of it had to come out....

and be replaced with plywood.

Once the new plywood was in, the Ditra was laid on top (shown here prior to mortaring onto the subfloor).

I spent several hours cutting all the tile first which is a bit risky as it is hard to keep the tiles from shifting and the cuts consistent. Once all the tiles were cut, they got mortared in and let set for a day or two.

Grouted.

The new toilet gets installed and everything gets caulked and prettied up.

New Backsplash

2009-10-08T18:09:00.007-05:00

Fulfilling a promise to my wife when we redid our kitchen floor, we finally got around to doing the kitchen backsplash. Mainly due to size, the backsplash went a lot faster than the floor. We tore the old tiles out in a few hours (a few weeks before), set the new tiles in four or five hours one day, and grouted in a few hours a week later. Though she had trepidation about her choice of tiles, Katie is very happy with them now that they are installed.

Original, boring small white square tiles:

Fancy new brick tiles, prior to putting in the grout:

Backsplash after grouting:

Completely cleaned up and finished.

Bye-Bye Bicycle

2009-09-30T14:58:00.002-05:00

Last Thursday my bicycle was stolen on-campus at Wichita State University. I'm normally very diligent about locking it up but forgot to when I made a quick run into the athletic center to get something out of my locker there. I was away from the bike for 30 seconds and when I came back it was gone. Shame on me for not locking up. Shame on the thief for taking something he/she did not own. I'm hoping that another student on campus took it and I'll spot it again soon but more than likely it is a lost cause. For now that means I'm riding my motorcycle to school and maybe someday I'll get another bike. Maybe.

Its a shame it was lost, though, because I actually used it quite a bit. It didn't have that many miles on it either, probably about 10,000 or so.

Phone Number Mix-Up

2009-09-17T16:51:00.004-05:00

I just got a call from a person unknown to me who has a phone number very close to mine. He sounded like an older gentleman and was having a problem with people calling him on his cell phone when they were trying to reach me. He was hoping that I could help him do something about this.

I was a bit perplexed. I know my phone number pretty well and may occasionally give out an incorrect variation of it but I assume I get it write most of the time. Clearly, I don't give out the wrong number with the intent of preventing communication between them and me. Similarly, I have not been not instigating some kind of prank on him by passing around a bogus phone number. From what he said, there have been quite a number of people calling him instead of me, ranging from the unemployment office to the insurance company to my friends.

I told him I didn't see what I could really do to help the situation; if I've handed out a bad phone number there's not much I can do at this point to keep people from using it. It seems more likely to me that people were mis-dialing my number than have it written down incorrectly but he didn't seem convinced of this; hence his call. He suggested that whenever I meet up with my friends or go to a place of business that has my number I double-check and make sure that their records are correct. This seemed like a reasonable suggestion but unless I make a campaign out of it and call all the appropriate people myself, it will probably take a while. The hardest part will be remembering to make a point of asking.

Oddly, there is another older couple in my life that has endured a similar mix-up. The couple the lives two doors down from us has a similar looking house (shape, color, yard) and when we first moved in, they got a lot of people knocking on their door looking for us. They seemed more amused by it than anything; we still have a good, neighborly relationship with them

Obama's Healthcare Speech

2009-09-10T06:17:00.006-05:00

Katie and I didn't have a chance to catch this evenings speach live so we read it together before going to be last night. This is the only reading we've done so far on Obama's proposals and what you're about to read is based entirely on that speech. You can be sure that I'll be doing more reading, both from those who are support and oppose this bill but for now, I'm mulling over what was said during the speech. And, as always, the devil is in the details. We've all seen good ideas get ground into worthless laws by the legislative process. The specifics of the bill (which I haven't seen yet) could make the intentions expressed by the President into a unhelpful legal mess.

Using lists as a crutch, here are my thoughts:

Federal Cost Controls I think that our national deficit is a very significant problem that seems to be commonly overlooked when it comes to legislation. I'm a member of the generation that, unless something is done, will literally be paying the consequences of our governments overspending and want something done to address the deficit sooner rather than later. I am glad that the President wants to include provisions in the bill to require the program not add to our federal deficit and if the savings the bill is intended to produce don't arrive, then it would require cuts in the budget to keep the plan budget-neutral. Not knowing any details, I'm skeptical of the level of efficiencies to be gained through the other aspects of his proposal but I am quite glad to hear that there are concrete and realistic measures being taken to keep this program from growing out of control.
Patient Cost Controls I was most surprised to hear the President propose a requirement for annual out-of-pocket maximums and removal of lifetime maximums from insurance policies. As a patient this is good news but it is not clear to me what the long-term consequences of this will be. Insurance companies have used things like a lifetime maximum to prevent a few patients from costing the company an extra-ordinary amount of money due to having to cover expensive treatments. This is another piece of the puzzle that prevents insurance companies from only insuring the healthy (see below) and because of that, I'm generally in favor of it. There's no such thing as a free lunch, though, and I wonder how this will play out over time.
Required Coverage I like both sides of this coin, both requiring nearly everybody to buy health insurance and requiring insurance companies to ignore "pre-existing conditions" when writing policies. These two items go together, hand-and-glove. As the President said, many insurance companies have (logically) sought to reduce their liability by trying to only insure the healthiest individuals. By removing the ability to deny coverage to anybody based on pre-existing conditions (that is, things the insurance companies know will cost them money) this bill would force the insurance industry to treat all of us like potential customers. By requiring everybody to have insurance, we make nearly our entire country the customer-base for these companies which should be something they like. They just can't pick and choose anymore and have to treat us all the same. This is a big first step in divorcing health insurance from our employers which should give us, the workers, more security by making it easier to switch employers.
Market Forces and Public Option The key to making me happy with a public option is that it is expected to operate more like a non-profit rather than a corporation subsidized by tax-payer dollars. This seems like a great idea to me; fighting the profit-driven insurance companies with a non-profit, patient-oriented entity. If a for-profit company can offer policies that are competitive with the public non-profit policies, then they deserve the money they earn. If they value they add is not enough to justify the price of their policies or if they become solely profit-oriented at the cost of making policy-holders satisfied, then they'll lose business. More generally, I see no problem in having for-profit businesses compete with non-profits even if in this case the non-profit is a government entity. The playing field is level as long as this government non-profit must be self-sufficient. I'm not totally clear on this but Obama said in his speech "Let me be clear - it would only be an option for those who don't have insurance. No one would be forced to choose it...." If my employer offers health insurance but I find that the public option is better for me, can I choose it? I think I need to be able to do that for there to be a true marketplace where choices force competition. In short, it seems like the public option might be a good way of introducing more market forces.
Waste and Increased Efficiencies The $900 billion price tag (over ten years) for this reform is intended to be paid for by reducing waste and inefficiencies in the current system. Specifically, this alleged waste resides in the way Medicare/Medicaid is handled by the insurance companies in their attempt to increase profits. I'm skeptical of the amount of waste alleged in the President's speech but I'm not in a good position to know one way or the other. I hope the President has good data in this regard because the ability for this reform to work well for all relies on these savings. As the President said, if these savings don't materialize, expenses have to get slashed and the reform gets gutted.
Subsidies From what I've read, if don't get insurance through your workplace and the open-market (with both the traditional for-profit insurance companies and the public non-profit company) can't offer an affordable policy, then a tax credit will be given to you which I assume is intended to make the policies affordable for low income earners. There is also a "hardship waiver" for individuals. I'm confused by this. Does this mean that as we move down the income scale the tax credit increases but insurance is still required until a given (very low) income level where the requirement to carry insurance is removed? If this is the case, I hope that the tax credits stop at that level as well.
Uninsured There will still be uninsured living in the US. The President made a point of saying that the insurance reform will not help illegal immigrants and he also said that there will be a "hardship waiver" for those who just can't afford health insurance. There is nothing in the speech about hospitals being allowed to turn away uninsured so I'm assuming that those that are insured will be indirectly subsidizing those that aren't insured when they go to the hospital. (Hospitals make up the money they lose on non-paying patients by raising the prices over-all for paying patients. Its the same way stores make up money lost to theft; they raise the prices on the paying customers to cover the loss). The percentage of uninsured needs to be very low for this to work.

Katie and I came up with a few items of note that this bill didn't seem to address:

Health Insurance Complexity As you've heard me rant about before, right now our health insurance system is quite complex. There is very little transparency in pricing, it is hard to shop around, billing overhead is significant for most providers, and the whole in-network/out-of-network stuff can drive you crazy. I heard nothing in the President's proposal to make any of this simpler. Whether you have a private or public insurance plan it sounds like you'll still be jumping through the same hoops. Providers will still have a mountain of paperwork to deal with, patients will still have to try to wade through bureaucracies to figure out how much a given procedure will end up cost them. I haven't had any personal experience with Medicare/Medicaid so I don't know if having the government as the insurer makes the process easier but I doubt it.
Healthy Living There didn't seem to be any effort to include in the bill some kind of provision to encourage us as citizens to live healthier lifestyles. Legislation like this is not easy to write but I can't recall anything the President said that would encourage people to make better lifestyle choices. There was some talk about encouraging marketplace competition so maybe insurers will come up with a way to encourage us to reduce their costs by going through some kind of wellness program. Stealing from Michael Pollan, I would love to see our government overhaul the Farm Bill in such a way that it was not so cattle/grain/pig-centric. Are their good reasons for not subsidizing fruits and vegetables instead of corn which often gets made into either cattle-feed or corn syrup?

The big take-away: health insurance will be required by law just like auto insurance is. For those who already have insurance, the cost of complying with this law should not increase and may decrease (depending on how effective this new insurance market works and other devilish details). For those currently without insurance, this will be an increased cost that there won't be any legal way around. I don't know if, on average, the dollars spent on health-care per person will increase or decrease. The hope is that by growing the market and forcing it to run more efficiently (by introducing a public non-profit into the competition) that the average will stay roughly the same while providing insurance to many more people. In short, economies of scale might just make this a win-win.

The Great Car Exchange

2009-09-08T18:44:00.005-05:00

This past Labor Day weekend I helped do a favor for my uncle living in Oregon by driving the car his son has in Kansas City half-way to Oregon and there, meeting with another party, switching cars and driving the replacement back to Kansas City. Actually, its a bit more complicated than that but that's the gist of it. My cousin had a rear-wheel drive Volvo and the weather in Kansas City can be such that rear-wheel drive is a bit dangerous. My uncle had a front-wheel drive Volvo he wanted to get to his son and recruited Katie and I to help make the car exchange happen. As it turns out, my uncle also recruited his brother (my father) to do the western leg of the drive so I also got to spend half a day with my parents in Evanston, Wyoming where we made the switch. Two thousand miles of driving, three days, several bottles of root beer. Good times.

One of the great things about the drive was getting to see a bunch of wind farms near the interstate. I'll put a few pictures up here but there are more on my Flickr stream. (I must admit, though, that once you've seen one wind turbine you've kind of seen them all. At least when you're driving by at 75 mph. Up close its a different story.)

Passing through Concordia, KS we saw this carved mural on the side of the tourist information/museum. I don't know how it was done or have ever seen anything like it.

Last but not least, in honor of a dear little girl I know who loves a DVD titled "I Dig Dirt", we saw one of the machines featured in said DVD. The photo is not near as impressive as seeing it action, even if just while driving by.

Return Paranoia

2009-09-03T12:44:00.002-05:00

One of our rear turn signals burnt out yesterday and so before heading out on a road trip this weekend, I went to AutoZone to get a replacement. I used the convenient part selection book to find the correct lamp and purchased it. Upon heading home and removing the headlight cover I found that I had purchased the wrong lamp. Pulling out the broken lamp as a reference I went back to AutoZone, found the lamp I needed, and went to the counter to make the return and purchase.

The clerk started on the return first and instead of just scanning the item and asking if I wanted it back on my credit card she asked for my name, phone number and address. I told here I didn't want to provide that information and she said for returns it was required. Not believing this, I clarified that even with a receipt and even having just purchased the item five minutes ago (literally, I live no more than five blocks from the store) they needed all this information. She said yes, the computer would not allow a return without this information. After thinking this over a few seconds I decided that it wasn't worth getting my name in their database for who knows what reason and told her I'd keep the wrong lamps and go buy the correct lamps at another store. Fortunately for me, one of their competitors is five or six blocks the other direction from where I live.

I'm not normally a big privacy advocate but am tired of getting junk mail and phone calls from corporations (despite being on the "Do Not Call" list) and usually decline to provide this information to businesses. Until now, none of them have refused to do business with me because I won't give them a name, phone number, or address. This was a first and its a bit scam-y that you probably don't know they'll want this information until they have your money and you'd like to make a return. All the more reason to make sure you buy the right item the first time.

Which, by the way, it turns out I did. I was looking in the wrong spot for the burnt-out turn signal and once I figured this out, realized I had purchased the correct part. In this one special case, I was able to stand on principle AND not be inconvenienced. I still don't plan on shopping at AutoZone any more, though.

School is my life

2009-09-02T20:10:00.003-05:00

As I suspected, with school now back in full swing I am once again fully busy. I've turned in my first two homework assignments and have started doing some background reading for my thesis. Due to a retirement and my lay-off, I've switched topics for the thesis and have to start over pretty much. Fortunately, I wasn't too far along in the process before all these changes hit. Even though we haven't decided that I'm doing a PhD, it is enough of a potential that I've got a handful of applications I'll have to do this semester as well.

So, consider this a pre-warning that my posting will probably get sporadic, just like they've always been.

(Oh, and we've finally got all the equipment we need to replace the backsplash in the kitchen and the front bathroom floor. That will also be sucking my time. Did I mention we're driving most of the Labor Day weekend to help move a car from Eugene, OR to Kansas City, MO? Fun times.)

Camping and Botanica

2009-08-26T09:21:00.003-05:00

More photos are now up on my Flickr stream from a camping trip in Colorado with Katie's parents and a trip I made to Wichita's Botanica Garden. Enjoy!

Health Insurance Reform (part 2)

2009-08-24T10:45:00.002-05:00

(Part 1 here.)

One of the podcasts I listen to (Planet Money) has lately been exploring the health insurance reform from an economics angle. They had a guest on this last Friday (Aug. 21st 2009) who made an excellent point that further illuminates to me that something is fundamentally wrong in the way health care works in the US.

DNA testing is slowing and surely growing in common practice. We aren't even close to something on par with the ultra-fast and comprehensive testing portrayed in Gattaca but were clearly headed in that general direction. There are tests now that can identify genetic markers that have been correlated to many types of cancers and other common genetically-induced maladies. All other things being equal, these tests are valuable for patients because they allow us and our doctors a more insightful view of our health. With more information we can make better decisions and, depending on a situation, may have incentive to make lifestyle changes to counter-act some of our genetic pre-dispositions. Using a very broad brush, I would say genetic tests are good for patients health...

... except if that information is by some means conveyed to a health insurance company and they use it to deny coverage. If I know that I have a genetic marker for a certain disease and don't disclose this to the insurance company when I try to buy a policy on the open market (that is, not through work or some other group plan), the insurance company has the ability to cancel my policy if or when they find out (called a rescission) . There was a recent hearing in Congress where health insurance executives were called to account for abusing this area of the law; it was not pretty. I am better off not having this information if I am trying to buy an individual policy because it isn't lying if you don't know the truth. Ignorance of my medical condition works to my advantage...

... except that this is my health we're talking about. I don't want to avoid information that could help improve my health so that I'm eligible for health insurance to treat the life-threatening disease I am genetically pre-disposed to. You see the problem? The incentives in our current system are all wrong. The health insurance companies don't want to have to cover people who are more likely to develop serious medical problems due to genetic pre-dispositions and patients want health insurance but shouldn't have to remain ignorant of any the results of any genetic testing for fear that they won't be able to get coverage.

The problem, once again, is revealed in the semantics: health insurance isn't really thought of as insurance any more, at least not by patients. We all get sick, we all need to go to the doctor, we all will have medical bills to pay. It isn't a matter of "if" but "when" and "how much". For the health insurance companies, I think "insurance" is the right word. They are thinking entirely in terms of liability and risk. We are insuring 500,000 right now: How many are going to get cancer? How many will be in a car accident? What is the average cost per patient? What can we do to improve our odds of having to make a big pay-out? Its all a numbers game and they are in it for a profit.

The fact that health insurance companies would like to have as much genetic testing information as possible so that they can remove as much risk from their pool of customers shows that something is wrong: who is going to cover all of us with genetic propensities that are completely out of our control? The insurance companies want to make as large a profit as possible and, to the extent the law allows, are going to do what they can to maximize that profit. That corporations are interested in profits should not surprise anybody. They have a strong incentive to reduce and eliminate costs by being as selective as they can with who they cover.

Our system is broken when information that is good for our health turns out to also be too expensive to know for our own good.

First day of class

2009-08-20T17:40:00.002-05:00

I had my first class of the semester this morning at 8am. The experience was completely unlike a year ago when I started my graduate work. Then I spent fifteen minutes wandering around campus trying to figure out which poorly labeled building I needed to go to. When I finally found the lecture hall, I entered to see a sea of students from south Asia; I was probably one of ten US citizens in that class of over 100. I knew nobody in there.

Today, I walked into the much smaller room to see eight other students (the other five showed up after me). I recognized all of them and knew seven of them by name. I was good friends with two or three of them. Today was much better.

Day before school

2009-08-19T13:59:00.008-05:00

Since today is my last day of my summer break before classes start again and I've finally got all the computer stuff here at working the way it should be, I'm finally going to put some of the pictures we took in Hawai'i up. I'll just be putting a few here but you can see a good deal more on my Flickr stream. (One of these days I'm going to get much better at keeping it up to date.)

We spent a good deal of time snorkeling, a new adventure for both of us. Snorkeling is super easy and in waters like we experienced with lots of wildlife, it was fun, fun, fun.

During one of our boat tours we saw both a monk seal and a sea turtle. It was humbling and awe-inspiring to see them both move through the water so easily and unencumbered.

There is a great deal of elevation change on the island that afforded some fantastic views

And of course, sunsets over the ocean are always great.

Like I said, there's more to see on my Flickr stream. Vicariously enjoy as the school year starts up again.

Health Insurance Reform

2009-08-17T08:45:00.003-05:00

I don't know much about the specifics of the current discussions and debate regarding health insurance reform. Since Congress has not finalized a bill in both houses prior to their August recess, I believe a lot of the details are still up for debate. What I do know about is my experience with health care and health insurance when I injured my back a few years ago. Based on that experience, I have some thoughts and opinions on how this system should work. More specifically, my thoughts are more along the lines of identification of problems I experienced. Its much easier to point out flaws than develop solutions and after thinking over this stuff for a few years, good solutions still allude me.

The trend in health-insurance I've noted is the move to HDHP (high-deductible health plans) and HSA (health savings accounts) and which usually are presented right along with the buzzword-BINGO term of "consumer-driven health care". The idea behind consumer driven health care is to bring a market-based approach to making health care better and more affordable.

The first part in this plan is the HDHP. Deductibles are raised to several thousand dollars in an effort to make the health-care recipient have "skin in the game". The "consumer" (more on the use of that term later) aka "patient" is responsible for paying all of that deductible and so has an incentive to shop around and find the most economically efficient way to get the services he/she needs. Its the consumer's money paying for the service and just like consumers have for ages, they will force the market (health care system) to provide quality products/services at competitive prices.

The trick to making HDHPs work is the second prong of this new idea, the HSA. The HSA is a tax-advantages account that holds funds used to cover costs of health care for the account owner. Money from these accounts can only be used for approved health-care services (physicals are OK, going to the witch-doctor is not) and all contributions are tax deductible. Also, this account is independent of the employer; when I lost my job at Cessna I kept my HSA and can continue to use that money for any health expenses I may have in the future.

The first real catch in consumer-driven health care shows up when the question of who is mainly responsible for funding the HSA arises. At Cessna, the employee is. The company contributes about 20% of the annual maximum contribution and the employee can choose to contribute more (tax-deductible) money or not. In my case, as a Cessna employee, the result of this was a significant increase in the cost of health care by me, the employee. I was responsible for 80% of the annual deductible whereas before this change, it was more like %40. I know of two other companies that have HDHP/HSAs and the employer provides the majority of the funds. In these cases, the employee bears roughly the same cost burden as they might under a more traditional plan but now has an incentive and discretion to use those funds more wisely.

The HSA funds aside, though, "consumer-driven health care" has a fatal flaw that will somehow need to be addressed if it is ever to take hold. The root of the problem is actually revealed in the syntax: "consumer". Consumers are people who shop around, look for good deals, make informed purchasing decisions, do their research, drive markets to better value and better products. Very few of these apply in a health-care setting.

Firstly, patients have a SEVERE knowledge gap regarding what kind of treatment and care they need. This will always be true and this is why we go to doctors. Granted, if an individual has a long-term specific condition, he/she can actively educate him/herself and ask intelligent questions of the doctors. Cancer patients tend to become more educated over time because they have an incentive and the time to become more educated. But nobody, when presenting with a severe pain in the stomach for example, will wait to hear the doctor's diagnosis, go home and read up on it, and decide whether he/she agrees with the doctor. As patients, we must place or trust in the our doctors and do the best we can to be informed as we go through treatment. In this regard, we are never informed consumers in the health-care market.

Secondly, as things stand right now, patients/consumers have a very hard time determining the price for a given procedure. Have you ever tried to shop around for routine treatment, trying to get the best price? I dare you to try. I started and gave up quickly. The structure of the health insurance system right now is not designed to easily define the price of a given procedure; there is no price tag for a colonoscopy (as was my case).

I know I won't get this exactly right but here is how the billing system worked when I was under the health insurance at Cessna. The health care provider has a number that most closely approximates the sticker price for a given procedure. If you were independently wealthy but had no insurance and walked in and asked for that procedure, that's how much you'd pay. If you do have health insurance, though, your insurance company has signed up with one or more "networks". I don't know all that goes into being part of a network but I do know part of it: price control. My health insurance, by being part of a given network, had gotten the health care providers to agree to charge a certain amount for a given procedure. By being in that network, the health care provider has a greater likelihood of seeing more patients because the health insurance company provides financial incentives to the patients/consumers to use in-network providers. So, if I go to in-network providers, rather than charging me the sticker price for the procedure, they charge me the lower network price and the provider sees more people like me who are trying to control their own health-care cost. You still with me?

Now, with the reduced price, the health care provider sends the bill off to the insurance company (as a courtesy to the patients, rather than making them deal with this mess). The insurance company takes that bill and looks at the specific agreement they have with me, the consumer/patient to determine what, if any part of this they will pay. Have I met my annual deductible? Am I in the cost-sharing payment zone? Is this preventative care that the insurance company pays for entirely? Is treatment even covered? (Have I gone to the witch-doctor who is then trying to get paid by the insurance company?) The health insurance company runs the claim through their computers and comes up with the amount they will pay the health-care provider. A payment for that amount is made.

The ball is back in the hands of the health-care provider. Odds are, the amount that the insurance company paid is not sufficient to cover the bill they sent. The provider then has a choice; do they bill the patient for the remainder or do they just absorb the loss. Most of the time, I'm guessing they bill the patient. To me, the end consumer/patient, this is my actual out-of-pocket cost.

Do you see all the machinations that number went through before I eventually got the bill? Trying to predict this number can be very difficult. The health-care provider should be able to quote the in-network cost they will bill the insurance company and it should be possible to call the insurance company and, if given the right information, they should be able to have a very good estimate on how much they will pay the health care provider but I'll let you guess how easy and how many phone calls it would take to figure out the final cost to the consumer/patient. If it was two phone calls totaling less than 30 minutes, I would be thrilled. In my experience, it was nowhere near that simple.

(As a side note, this billing shenanigans is entirely avoided for organizations like Kasier Permenante, a health care provider that is also an insurance company. There is no external billing, no passing-the-buck. All of these costs are monitored and set in-house and because there is no distinction between insurer and provider, the final cost is much more easy to determine up-front. Also, the patient never has to wonder if a given procedure is covered by insurance; if the doctor's prescribe it, the procedure is covered.)

In my case, it gets worse. As an example, my doctor recently suggested I have a colonoscopy done and I started trying to look into how much this would cost. It turns out that there are several parties involved in a colonoscopy. There's the facility (provides the location for the procedure), the doctor (the one actually doing the procedure), an anesthesiologist (keeping the patient safely unaware during the unpleasantness) and if a biopsy of something in the colon needs to be done, a pathologist of some sort. In the case of my health care provider, my doctor would perform the operation and the clinic I went to had a colonoscopy suite. When I called asking about prices, my clinic was able to quote to price they would bill the insurance company with a high degree of certainty for those two parts of the bill. The anesthesiologist, though, was brought in from out-of-house and any one of several may be used during that procedure. Each anesthesiologist has a different cost, I had no control over which one was used the day of The complications for the pathologist was similar.

So what I am supposed to do as an empowered consumer in this consumer-driven health care? How am I supposed to compare prices when there is literally no define-able price tag? Do I go look for a larger clinic here in town that also has a colonoscopy suite and also staffs an anesthesiologist and a pathologist so that all costs could be known ahead of time? That wouldn't even solve the problem because then I would only have a price for that clinic and not knowing what I was getting for that price doesn't really help me. How can I compare prices when I can only get one place in town to even get me a quote, anyway?

My point, if it is not utterly obvious, is that consumer-driven health care is dead in the water until a price tag for procedures is readily available. There is no way it can work until I can call five colonoscopy providers in Wichita and get five prices. Even then, I face the difficulty of not knowing what I'm getting for my money? Do I go with the cheapest provider? Do I go with the provider I know best? How do I learn about each of these providers? Online reviews for doctors? Ask around?

You see, we aren't consumers when it comes to health care; we're patients. There may be some areas of health care that could eventually fit a market-based model. Colonoscopies are routine; it may be possible to create a health-care system where a consumer can effectively shop around for a colonoscopy using a traditional consumer mind-set. Maybe there will be online reviews for colonoscopy providers. Maybe a clinic in town will specialize in colonoscopies and find a way to provide a cheap and effective way of doing the procedure and they end up doing most of the colonoscopies in town. It could happen and I don't necessarily think it would be a bad thing. I also agree that one way to control health-care costs is to provide incentives for patients to get the least expensive, best treatment they need. Having skin in the game is not a bad thing at all.

But we're patients, not consumers. We're not customers and clinics are not merchants selling wares. At some point, health care is a highly personal and personalized/customized system. Whatever the reform brings, if it forgets this point we all loose. There is no other way to keep people healthy than by treating, handling, and caring for them on an individual basis, case-by-case. This is why we go to see doctors in person, often ending up waiting longer than we'd like in some lobby. We need that individualized care and market-based models, if permitted to control the entire system, do not afford the individual.

Scooter is sold!

2009-08-15T12:45:00.003-05:00

Today I finally realized one goal I had for this summer: the sale of my scooter. In late March I replaced my scooter with a more traditional motorcycle but due to a lot of factors wasn't able to sell it until later in the summer, after we got back from Hawai'i. I put it up on Craigslist a while back and have had a fair number of inquiries, a few offering to buy at half the offering price, one or two that came by to looker, but no serious offers. Until today.

I was able to sell it for about what I hoped and I'll be able to get a refund on registration which is only a month or two old. As a bonus, we now have more space in our garage and my wife is very happy to be done with it.

Now that I'm done with it, I'm still can't say that I think it was the best choice for a first bike, especially given the fact that I was able to buy my current bike for less and I suspect it will last longer. The scooter did fill its role in providing cheap transportation for three years, though and in that regard, I can be satisfied. The funny thing is that now that I'm won't have to be commuting to Cessna this school year, I may not end up riding the motorcycle much since I'll be on bicycle much of the time. When that time comes, though, I suspect that I'll have an easier time selling the motorcycle than this scooter.

Officially Unemployed

2009-08-12T11:26:00.003-05:00

Though I have not been working for the past 60 days at the request of my employer, August 7th was my last day of employment at Cessna Aircraft Company. Today I got three or four mailings from the Kansas Department of Labor outlining how employment benefits work and what I need to do to file a claim. I will be going to school this fall and it is not clear to me whether I will be eligible for benefits during that time. It seems kind of weird that, generally speaking, you can't earn unemployment benefits after being laid-off if you go back to school to re-train for another job (like I'm doing). One of the letters that I got made it very clear that I need to be seeking full-time work to receive benefits and I think from their perspective, schooling (even if for another job) keeps you from doing just that, at least if the school is during the day. We'll see how the state views my situation when I start back up with classes in a week.

In the meantime, Cessna may have hit bottom here in the past month or so. There are no new announced lay-offs at this time and engineers will be unaffected by the lay-offs on the 14th of this month. We'll see what happens when that day arrives but if no new announcements are made, then it will be the first time in about a year that the company will not be in a state of pending lay-offs. In fact, I've heard that in some engineering areas, it has become apparent that the company cut too deeply and that they are either trying to re-hire employees they laid off or are generally looking to fill some positions.

I don't know if my area is one of those that is trying to re-hire or not but I kind of doubt it. I certainly haven't been contacted to see if I would like to come back on. When the good times do return, my group will probably be in the same position it was for most of my time at Cessna: multiple open positions and having a hard time filling them. Cessna has difficulty hiring people for the job I had because the work is relatively specialized (compared to some of the other work for electrical engineers at the company) and it is hard for them to compete for talent.

Probably the biggest barrier to overcome in the labor market is one they have no control over: their location. Wichita, KS is not attractive to many graduates in electrical engineering when they could be working in a big city like Dallas or Chicago or more scenic places like California or Oregon. It would seem that to overcome this Cessna would want to offer something to entice people over; things like higher salaries, good benefits, etc. Unfortunately, in my experience, this doesn't seem to be the case. Many other companies offer higher salaries (though they may not be once cost-of-living is factored in), better benefits, and a better living location than Cessna can. In my move from Micron to Cessna, this was exactly my experience. I moved from wonderfully scenic Boise to the great, flat plains of Wichita, took a significant pay cut, ended up with three weeks less of vacation per year and higher health insurance costs. The only reason I accepted all these things was so that I could be with the woman who is now my wife; I think these material losses were worth it. There is no way I would have made this move, though, if it hadn't been for her.

I wish the best for Cessna, especially as my wife is still working there, but I fear they may have painted themselves into a corner. We'll see over the next year or so how things turn out for them.

Mail-Order Monday

2009-08-04T07:47:00.007-05:00

Yesterday was a great day to get stuff in the mail.

First up: rear baskets for my bicycle. When bicycling to school, I've been pretty unhappy with having to lash my bag to my rear bicycle rack with a bungee cord. It usually held but I tended to knock the wiring off my rear light and spend a few minutes each day trying to get it all plugged back in correctly. Katie and I looked around and found some baskets that seemed like they would work both for me going to school and grocery shopping when need be. Behold the Wald 582 baskets installed on my blue Breezer:

The baskets can also fold up like so to allow for easy storage:

Installation was straight-forward but not simple, at least with my rear rack. Three clamps secured by screws were provided for each side. I had to re-bend the clamps as they were clearly designed for a rear rack with a thinner frame. It was also a bit tricky to figure out how to get the necessary screw-driver and pliers in position to screw those clamps down tight. I don't know if there is an easier way of doing things but it definitely seems like an area of improvement.

The second package that arrived was actually addressed to Katie but when she got home she informed me that it was actually for me: a new (to me) iPod! Mine died a month or two ago and though I have easily survived without it, I am glad to have a replacement. There is a lot I like about this new one but the most significant is that Apple can replace the battery when it wears out; Apple didn't provide this service for the older ones I used.

The only order we've placed that still hasn't come in is the tile for our backsplash. It was supposed to be in Friday, then Saturday, then Monday... We were very happy with our shopping experience at this hardware store (Star Lumber) but actually getting the items we've ordered has turned out to be, while not frustrating, not an experience that is endearing us to them. Is it better than Home Depot and Lowes? Probably. The company is locally owned which is another point in its favor. Now they just need to get their act together and make the delivery experience as high quality as the sales experience. You only really have one chance to make a good first impression and they may have blown it here.