Seen today in the neighborhood

Tron: Legacy

I convinced my brother in-law that we should go see "Tron: Legacy" while he was in town recently and we choose to lay out the big bucks and go see it at the newly opened IMAX. Oh, and it was in 3D. The only 3D movie I'd seen before this was "Avatar" and while it was nice, I wasn't convinced that it was worth the extra three or four dollars. This opinion was reinforced by commentary I had read around the web that "Avatar" had the best implementation of 3D as it was actually filmed with two cameras while most of the other 3D movies had been made so in post-production.

I didn't have high expectations of "Tron: Legacy" and was just hoping for an entertaining show: lots of cool looking things on screen with the thinnest of plots to hold the excitement together. Seeing it in 3D IMAX was a novelty, I reasoned, something new to try out. My preconceptions were more or less accurate but were understatements of the reality. "Tron: Legacy" in 3D IMAX an experience more than a movie. I can't say that the plot was superb or the extremely well-written but nearly every other aspect of the film is excellent. The use of 3D is very well done and adds much to the movie, much more than I remember in "Avatar". The visuals are stunning, integrate well with and strongly develop the style of the movie, and are exceedingly enjoyable. Costumes and sets were similarly unique and impressive.

The surprise to me, though, was the the music and sound. This was more than good use of orchestral scoring; it was an embrace of synthesized, manipulated, stretched and compressed alteration of traditional music into a unique sound that, again, adds so much in defining the style and feel of the whole film. I don't feel that the audio overshadowed the visuals just that they were not neglected in light of all the effort of making a visually stunning movie. I'm tempted to buy the score of the film because it was so unique and powerful.

I don't think "Tron: Legacy" would have struck with me so deeply if I hadn't seen it first in IMAX 3D. If you have the option of seeing it that way I would recommend it; its probably the only way I would recommend this movie. In this way the movie is a work of art; the experience of seeing it will not be replicated well onto a more conventional screen and even less so into a home setting. It will be like the difference between an original oil and a picture of the same work in an art textbook.

Its hard to compare this movie to others because it is so much more of an experience than simply a movie. There are much better films out there that don't derive their value from special effects or visual spectacle. But its hard to say that "Tron: Legacy" is better or worse than any of these because its value is so much in the presentation. Pick your favorite movie and even if you were able to see it again on the big screen right now, it would be a completely different experience than "Tron: Legacy".

Maybe that's the best way to think about it. "Tron: Legacy" has brought back something special to the movies. You will either see it in its fullest form or you won't but there won't be any second chances. Once it leaves the theater, there really won't be any way to get the full meal deal. Its like performance art in that way; a one-time experience that can't be replicated. If you can afford the $12 to $15 per ticket I strongly recommend that make an effort to go see this. You won't walk away with inner contemplations about the plot or characters but you can't help to be entertained.

It is the best movie of little consequence I have ever seen.

100% Official

As of yesterday, I have completed all the requirements for my Master's degree. I took my final test of the semester (Statistics) and received confirmation from the graduate school that all my paperwork was in order and that my thesis had been officially accepted.

The graduation ceremony was this past Sunday and I attended but had chosen not to walk, mainly because I'm staying on for my PhD making the ceremony very anti-climactic. I attended the ceremony to see a good friend of mine get his PhD and while waiting for the ceremony to start, I was thumbing through the program. There I was, listed as completed my Master's along with my thesis title. Even for me, a person who doesn't care much for ceremony, this was a little weird. I felt like I should run up on stage and get in line will all the other Master's students. I was literally just a few hundred feet away from being able to participate in the ceremony.

For me now, school will just continue for a while. Classes start up again in mid-January and I'll be attending the normal three lecture classes, just like I have for the past five semesters. Looking at my estimated schedule for the next few years, it doesn't look like things start to change much until spring 2011 when I begin taking my dissertation hours. Each semester from that point on I spend more and more time on my official schedule working on my dissertation until I complete it in the spring of 2013. At least that's how thing stand now; all of this is subject to change and probably this spring I'll be submitting more paperwork to get this schedule of mine officially approved as worthy of PhD work.

There is a hiccup that I already know of in my schedule. The Engineering and Education departments recently got together to form a program specifically geared towards graduate students in engineering who plan on a career in academia, like me. By taking four specific graduate level education classes, I will be able to earn a Certificate in Engineering Education. The problem: the engineering graduate department may not recognize any of those education courses as "counting" towards earning a PhD. This means that if any engineering student wants to earn this certificate, he or she will have to take these four courses on top of the normal course load for a PhD. Nothing is completely decided yet but it seems counter-productive to me to working across departments like this to get the program in place and then to construct additional barriers to prevent students from actually participating in the program. Methinks the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing.

You Balance the Budget

In terms of posts to this blog, I've written a lot about the Federal deficit and balancing the budget. This is one more item on that list.

The New York Times has an interactive feature on their website that allows everyday normal people like us to take a stab at balancing the budget and getting our national debt under control. The interface is simple: there are a list of options that each make a dent in the budget problem and you go through and check the ones that get you to a balanced budget. Its easy to use and gives you a very tangible handle on what it will take to make our federal government fiscally responsible.

Go ahead and give it a try. Spread the word. Start thinking seriously about what it will take for our government to start acting like grown-ups when it comes to money.

Cranberry Sauce

Do you make your own cranberry sauce for Thanksgiving (or any other holiday meal) or do you buy it in a can? If you don't make your own cranberry sauce you really should. Its just too easy and too fun to pass up. You can buy a bag of cranberries for a few dollars, add some sugar and water and heat it all up until the berry begin to burst. That's right, I said burst; its like making popcorn with fruit! (There are plenty of more detailed recipes out there if you feel you need more detailed instructions but really, its that simple and hard to get wrong.)

Sure, its cheaper, easier, and faster to buy the sauce in a can but the two don't really even compare. Unless you're really strapped for cash and/or time, spend the extra two bucks and fifteen minutes to make the sauce yourself. Or better yet, get some quality kitchen time with a family member or friend and recruit them to do it.

Fresh cranberries will be readily available in the US for several more weeks so don't wait. I'm betting once you try it, you'll never go back. I haven't.

First snow of the season

Its not accumulating here in Wichita but it is snowing. See for yourself

Master Hardy

It's all but official. I defended my thesis this last Friday and now just have some editing, probably a bit more formatting, and hopefully just a tiny amount of paperwork to do before I have earned my Master of Science in Electrical Engineering from Wichita State. Oh, and I need to pass my classes this semester as well. On a practical level things don't change much for me, though. I'm continuing on with my PhD so I have many more semesters to go before this is all done.

We'll, here's a mostly completed, almost perfect draft version of my thesis. Feel free to read, enjoy, and ask questions. Or you can just smile and now and not worry about it. Whatever.

Basil's new trick

We've been working with Basil to train him to go and get the paper in the morning; we anticipate this trick being very handy for the coming winter months. Here's a demonstration from this morning:

The word is spreading!

David Leonhardt must have been reading my blog because, on a nationally syndicated radio program (Marketplace), echoed nearly exactly (almost verbatim) what I've been saying about what it will take to balance the budget. We've got the make big cuts in one of the following: Medicare, Social Security, or defense and/or raise taxes. The most politically fleasible option will probably involve modest changes to many or most of these.

The message is getting out! You heard it here first (maybe)!

Everyday Amazing

That's how I'd describe this video; its an example of everyday amazing. There are cooler videos out there, I'm sure and other people have done similar things but here is a pretty normal looking guy who wants to do something at least slightly extraordinary: make a spacecraft. And he does. And captures some footage that can best be described as awesome in the traditional sense of the word.

Watch it full screen in a dark room. Prepare to be amazed.

Homemade Spacecraft from Luke Geissbuhler on Vimeo.

Before Congress gets back to balancing the budget...

I know I just wrote about this a few posts ago but one of my favorite podcasts (Planet Money) mentioned a report that effectively gave a receipt showing how are federal tax dollars are spent. The categories they chose to track seem a bit arbitrary but its worth taking a look at. And the top 3: Defense, Social Security, Health Insurance.

The report also referenced a few other great websites that try to get a handle on the same data. WhatWePayFor.com lets you plug in your salary and generate a dollar-amount break-down for your tax bill and the National Priorities Project has a Tax Day page that does a similar thing in less detail.

Health Insurance and Me

I've ranted about this before: I have no love for the health insurance I currently have. There are many things to complain about but the one that is troubling me most lately is the plan's attempt to portray its bugs and difficulties as features; I'm talking about consumer-driven health-care. The theory behind these plans place the health insurance policy-holders in the role as consumer and thus place the responsibility of controlling health-care costs in said policy-holders hands. By placing the burden on the policy-holders to make the financial choices on how the health-care dollars are spent, a more direct relationship between those paying for the care and those receiving the care is formed. Financial self-interest becomes a factor in making health-care choices and the policy-holders/patients don't freely spend money when they think of it as theirs rather than the insurance companies.

I like the theory but the way my insurance is set up now it utterly defeats any attempt to make this work in practice. I found this out again when I tried to price out the total cost I will have to pay for a minor procedure I have soon. Due to specialization, fragmentation, multiple providers and a complicated billing system, it is practically impossible to determine the cost for this procedure before I actually get a bill in the mail. I can get a price for the doctor performing the procedure and I can get a price for procedure (if its at the only in-network hospital here in town but it could be at any other number of smaller clinics who charge their own prices). I can't, though, get a price for the anesthesiologist who will be helping during the procedure because nobody, not the doctor, not the hospital, knows who that will be anytime closer than a day or two before the procedure. Getting the incomplete prices I did took me three or four hours of phone calls.

To state it plainly, my health insurance company forces me to go shopping for the my health care providers and when I do, I find out that nothing has price tags. It is virtually impossible to try to manage my health care costs the way my insurance company says I should. The health insurance company wants to make it seem that by shopping around I can control my health care costs but I know this isn't true and it is hard to imagine that health insurance executives don't know this as well. Besides, would you choose a surgeon, radiologist, or oncologist you had never met to perform a one-time medical procedure because he or she was the most affordable? I can't think of anybody who would unless they had no choice. And don't even get me started on in- and out-of network, deductibles, co-insurance, co-pays, and the cyclical billing routine between medical service provider, insurance company and patient.

I've made this challenge before and I'll make it again: I double-dog dare you to try to find out the price you will actually have to pay for any given medical procedure a priori. Unless it is not much more than a simple visit to your everyday doctor where no testing is done (and what doctor do you know that doesn't want to "run a few tests" while you're there) you will not be able to get a price of any value before you actually go in.

At least I can't. Not one accurate enough to be useful, that is.

Recently heard on campus...

"I'm addicted to feeding the squirrels."

More on Federal Spending

I recently found an interesting report outlining how the income and expenditures of the federal government broken out by state. In partcular, the report highlighted the fact that there are some states in the union that historically consume more tax dollars than they generate; they are subsidized by the country as a whole. Conversely, there are states that generate more in taxes than they receive from the government.

Take a look at the report here and see where your favorite state (or maybe the states you love to hate) stack up. The most important columns are the last two showing the received-to-spending ratio (values over $1.00 mean the state was subsidized, values less than $1.00 mean the state did the subsidizing) and the ranking of the state in terms of dollars received.

I'll leave it as an exercise to the reader to decide whether citizens should be proud or not of their states' abilities to attract federal spending. Some call it "bringing home the bacon" and they vote based on who they think can bring the most money to the state. When it comes to tax dollars, though, its a zero-sum game; federal dollars flowing into the state have to come from somewhere and it will largley be taxes collected from another state. This is another way to look at federal taxes as wealth redistribution: money moving from "rich" states to "poor" states (or something like that).

First Day

My first lecture has come and gone as a instructor at Wichita State University. It went well. Despite the late hour of the class (5:35pm to 6:50pm) the students seemed awake and participating. We got through the introductory material and started into the content; I was even able to put up the first homework assignment (though it won't officially be due for over a week). I made one blunder in assigning an in-class problem which turned out to be much more difficult than I realized when I opened my mouth. I caught it after a minute or so and was able to call it off before I did too much educational damage. At least that's what I'm telling myself right now. Moral of the story: stick to the notes I've prepared for myself, particularly when it comes to examples and practice problems.

Oh, and I accidentally left my travel mug of water in the lecture hall overnight. It was still there when I came by early the next morning.

I still haven't received the official contract for teaching this class, though. Its the only thing holding me back from being 100% officially hired.

Windows

Two days out of the week I have long days at school, about twelve hours on campus. While I was waiting for my last class of the day I noticed the following. I've speeded up the video to make the effect the wind was having on these windows more obvious.

The last part of the clip is slowed down to normal speed so that I could provide some context to the problem. The windows are probably five feet tall and each pane is probably three or four feet wide. The hallway is a hundred feet or so. This is a lot of glass that doesn't seem to be solidly attached to the rest of the building. I have the distinct impression that the plate screwed into the window frame shown in this clip was added after installation.

Its almost 100% official...

Yesterday I got a few more keys to add to the growing ring, today I was given another and received training on how to use the projector system in the room I will be using for lecture.

Then there's this little excerpt from the course catalog listing for this semester:

Now all I need is for the last bit of paperwork to go through giving me access to the part of the computer system where I enter grades and I'll be set.

Defense, Social Security, Health Care

I was in a discussion with a friend recently about the national debt, a topic that we are both concerned about. I was trying to point out that most of the federal budget is being spent on just a few things but didn't have the numbers in front of me to confirm this. Now I do.

The chart comes from Wikipedia; they used publicly available data.

There are three general areas of federal spending that make up a significant portion of the federal budget: defense, Social Security, and health care (Medicare and Medicaid). (Since this is 2008 data, there is no mention of the new health insurance reform and it will several years before we have data on how much that is actually costing us). The total of these three is 58% of our budget. If you throw in welfare and other "non-discretionary" spending the total comes in at 67%.

If we are serious about being fiscally responsible we need to look at cutting spending and when cutting costs, you don't look at the small things first. Completely eliminating, say, the funding for the Department of Justice will not make much of a difference in terms of limiting spending. Killing NASA won't help out much either. The federal government is involved in many, many, programs but when you get look at the data, most of these spend very little in the scope of the entire federal budget.

Here's my point: if you get in a discussion about balancing the federal budget just remember the big three. Make it a mantra. Defense, Social Security, Medicare & Medicaid. Don't let anybody get you off topic with talks of killing NASA or ending the Department of Education. Everybody has a part of the federal government that they love to hate and often political motivations can hide behind the mask of fiscal responsibility. (This is the reason I don't like including the "welfare and other non-discretionary" spending in the total; everybody has an opinion about welfare.) These programs are small fry's and killing them won't really help us out any.

To balance the budget we have to choose to confront the reality that most of our spending is in programs and that most people see as non-negotiable. Even my wife's very conservative mother, a woman who wants a smaller federal government, lower taxes, and a balanced budget, does not want to see significant cuts to the entitlement programs of Social Security and Medicare. Reality is unforgiving in this regard, though. The big three need be smaller. Defense, Social Security, Medicare & Medicaid.

How are we going to get from there to here? What sacrifices will you make to bring the help bring the country back into financial balance? The federal government has for some time now been balancing its budget by borrowing and we all know that this can't go on forever. The sooner that we get serious about a legitimately balanced budget, the sooner we can start paying down the debt. In 2008, we spent 9% of our federal dollars just on interest for the debt.

Defense, Social Security, Medicare & Medicaid.

We are the federal government. Don't simply blame the politicians for making politically expedient choices and avoiding unpopular ideas like cutting Social Security benefits. These ideas are untenable only because we, the people who elect them, don't want to make the choice for ourselves. If cutting Social Security benefits had our strong support then there is no doubt elected officials would openly advocate for it. We, the electorate, have to be willing to sacrifice if we expect our representatives to make the changes in law that will be required to balance the budget. Don't blame them; we gave them the job.

Defense, Social Security, Medicare & Medicaid.

Watering

My wife just got done watering our maple tree in the backyard. It is a full, mature tree but due to the weeks of high heat (highs at 95'F or greater, lows of 80) and no rain, the tree has started to shed its leaves. The backyard has a pool of green, dry, crinkly leaves around the tree; it looks quite sad.

Teaching

I found out yesterday around lunch time that I will be teaching my first course at WSU this fall, CS 194 Intro to Digital Design. The appointment comes pretty close to the start of the school year (two weeks away) and so I'm going to be scrambling a bit to try to get prepared. Thankfully the professor who teaches it normally has mercifully volunteered her notes and homework so me to use/copy/modify.

The content of the course is not difficult for me to understand and I'm hoping my students will be able to catch on relatively quickly. The bigger struggle for me will be the less direct issues in teaching: pace, proper amounts and difficulty of homework and tests, classroom management, etc. This will be especially true given that this course will consist largely of freshman in their first semester at college.

For now I'm busy trying to re-learn the specifics of the material that I've forgotten and formulate the early lectures, at least in my head. This should be an adventure.